The Mosque: A State within a State

by Vijay Kumar

THE KABAH IN MECCA WAS NOT BUILT AS AN ISLAMIC MOSQUE. It was an ancient temple that had been shared by polytheists, Christians, Jews, and Hindus, honoring 360 different deities. In 630 A.D. the Kabah was captured by Islam in its military invasion and conquest of Mecca.

On the day of its capture, Mohammed delivered an address at the Kabah in military dress and helmet, according to Ayatullah Ja’far Subhani in his book, “The Message”:

“Bear in mind that every claim of privilege, whether that of blood or property is abolished . . . I reject all claims relating to life and property and all imaginary honors of the past, and declare them to be baseless . . . A Muslim is the brother of another Muslim and all the Muslims are brothers of one another and constitute one hand as against the non-Muslims. The blood of every one of them is equal to that of others and even the smallest among them can make a promise on behalf of others.” —Mohammed

Mohammed’s address at the Kabah overthrew the Meccan government and declared all of Islam, anywhere in the world, to be a political and military state against all non-Muslims, regardless of the non-Muslims’ political, geographical, or national origins.

“If anyone desires a religion other than Islam (submission to Allah), never will it be accepted of him.” —Koran 3:85

Although the rightful owners of the Kabah are the many religions that shared it before the Islamic military conquest of Mecca, according to Subhani the Kabah today is under the control of a hereditary regime going back to Mohammed: “currently the 12th Imam from the direct descent of the Prophet of Islam is the real protector, its custodian and guardian.”

All Islamic mosques everywhere in the world are required to have a clear visible indication pointing in the direction of Mecca and the Kabah, where the international political and military state of Islam was founded. In most mosques there is a niche in the wall—the mihrab—that points toward the seat of Islamic power. Each mosque, like the Kabah, is governed by an Imam in compliance with the political documents of Islam.

Mosques and the Political Documents of Islam

The Koran is the supreme political document of Islam—its political manifesto and political constitution. It is the only constitution of the nation-state Saudi Arabia, which is the home of Mecca and the Kabah, where all mosques point, and is the birthplace of Islam.

The Koran is a totalitarian constitution. It demands submission by anyone within its jurisdiction. The Koran governs all mosques everywhere in the world.

As a political document, the Koran asserts that everyone in the world is within its jurisdiction. So far, Islam has not been able to enforce that totalitarian claim on the entire world, but has managed to do so through threat, infiltration, violence, terrorism, and coercion on roughly 20% of the world. It is engaged in a 1400-year-long Universal Jihad to dominate the rest of the world. All mosques are its outpost headquarters.

Central to the Koran’s political mandates is prohibition of religious freedom and religious tolerance, along with denouncements of religions such as Christianity and Judaism.

“O ye who believe! take not the Jews and the Christians for your friends and protectors: They are but friends and protectors to each other. And he amongst you that turns to them (for friendship) is of them.” —Koran 5:51

“Fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war)” —Koran 9:5

All mosque leaders must be loyal to and supportive of these political and militaristic mandates.

The Koran as a political document also forbids separation of church and state. That is why every Islamic nation, where Islamic leaders have managed to gain power, is a theocracy, ruled by the Koran and Islamic Sharia law.

The Hadith (reported sayings and acts of Mohammed) and the Sira (the official biographies of Mohammed) are the other political documents that, along with the Koran, constitute the basis for Islam’s Sharia law.

“There is only one law which ought to be followed, and that is the Sharia.” —Syed Qutb

Sharia law is administered by Islamic Imams who interpret the law and hand down rulings in their sole discretion. Sharia law does not allow trial by jury. Sharia law also mandates a double standard of laws for Muslims (believers) and infidels (non-believers). Sharia law mandates a discriminatory tax, called jizya, on non-Islamic religions and nations:

“Fight those who believe not in Allah…until they pay the jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.” —Koran 9:29

Sharia law also mandates discrimination toward women, and forbids any criticism of Islam or its founder, stifling freedom of speech.

Sharia law also mandates that all men are slaves with no right to freedom of religion:

“Allah’s right on His slaves is that they should worship Him (Alone) and should not worship any besides Him.” —Mohammed, Sahih Bukhari 4:52:108, Narrated Mu’adh

Sharia law does not allow for separation of church and state. Sharia regards church and state as one inseparable entity governing every aspect of individual and social life, both spiritual and secular. That is why all Islamic nations are theocracies.

In short, Sharia law stands in direct opposition to the American Constitution and Bill of Rights. The implementation of Sharia law demands the overthrow of the American Constitution and our form of government and system of laws. Mosque leaders, in every nation in the world, are loyal to the Koran, the Hadith, the Sira, and consider them divine law, and therefore supreme over all manmade laws.

Other political and military documents of Islam include treaties of Mohammed, which are held in reverence by Islam as models of conduct in relations between nations.

“Ye have indeed in the Messenger of Allah [Mohammed] a beautiful pattern (of conduct) for anyone whose hope is in Allah.” —Koran 33:21

“War is deceit.” —Mohammed, Sahih Bukhari 4:52:268, Narrated Abu Hurarira

In one treaty proposal, to Jaifer and Abd, Mohammed wrote:

“If you two accept Islam, your country will, as usual, remain with you. But if you refuse or object, it is a perishable thing.” —Mohammed

In another, to the Chiefs of Aqaba, he wrote:

“It is better for you either to accept Islam or agree to pay Jizya and consent to remain obedient to Allah . . . If you do not accept these terms . . . I shall have to wage war (to bring peace and security).” —Mohammed

These same patterns and political mandates have been used over and over by Muslims since 610 A.D. to invade and conquer many civilizations and nations throughout the world, and to eradicate human rights and freedoms in those lands. Iran once was called Persia and was Zorastrian. Egypt was Christian. What was once a Hindu civilization was conquered and made into Pakistan, which is now part of the Axis of Jihad, along with Iran and Saudi Arabia. Afghanistan was Buddhist for thousands of years. Now its chief exports are heroin and Islamic terrorism.

“When We decide to destroy a population, We (first) send a definite order to those among them who are given the good things of this life and yet transgress; so that the word is proved true against them: then (it is) We destroy them utterly.” —Koran 17:16

In every instance where Islam has conquered and “destroyed utterly” a nation or civilization, the key to the conquest was the establishment of mosques, which are political and military command and control centers for Islam, and which all point toward the seat of Islamic power: the Kabah.

Mosques and the Fallacy of the “Moderate Muslim”

The majority of Germans during World War II were not active members of the Nazi party, were not waging war, and were not involved in the holocaust. The leaders, though, were active members of the Nazi party, were waging war, and were involved in the holocaust.

The majority of Russians and eastern Europeans under the rule of the U.S.S.R. were not trying to spread Communism throughout the world, and were not threatening and waging war and revolution, but were going about their daily lives trying to survive. The leaders, though, were doing everything they could to spread Communism throughout the world, and were threatening and waging war and revolution.

Throughout history, since 610 A.D., the leaders of Islam have been waging Universal Jihad around the world for the purpose of Islamic totalitarian domination of the world. It has never mattered what percentage of the Muslim population was “peaceful” or “moderate.” Peace and moderation are not relevant to the totalitarian mandates of Islam’s political documents, and Islam’s leaders always follow the totalitarian mandates of Universal Jihad contained in them.

There are post-Nazi democracies. There are post-Communist democracies. There are no post-Islamic democracies. Literal Islam, as contained in its political documents, is the consummate totalitarianism. Neither Nazism or Communism had a metaphysical factor, as does Islam. Islam uses its metaphysics as a wedge to drive in its totalitarian political doctrines.

Once Islam has established itself sufficiently in any nation, it seeks to overthrow any existing regime or constitution or law, and replace it with Islamic theocracy. Even the most “moderate” Muslim is bound to obey Islamic law, and so is bound to fight if ordered to fight:

“When you are called (by the Muslim ruler) for fighting, go forth immediately.” —Hadith Sahih Bukhari 4:52:79:Narrated Ibn ‘Abbas

All Islamic mosques have Islamic leaders (rulers) who can call Muslims for fighting, and as such are satellite headquarters for spreading Literal Islam’s political doctrine of world domination and totalitarianism—no matter how many “moderate Muslims” they serve.

Mosques and the Worldwide Islamic State

Islam is a de facto political state wherever it exists anywhere in the world. The Koran is its constitution. The Kabah is its seat of power, still in the control of the regime that occupied it in 630 A.D. All Muslims in the world, regardless of nationality, are required to travel to the Kabah at least once in their lifetime and pay homage to it.

The fact that nations and international political institutions in the world do not recognize Islam as a de jure state is irrelevant. Mohammed himself declared it as a state, and Islam’s own political documents declare it to be a state, and, ipso facto, it always is a state-within-a-state, governed by the Koran and Sharia law internally, anywhere that it has not yet gained full power and control.

“The Believers are but a single brotherhood.” —Koran 49:10

“A Muslim has no nationality except his belief.” —Syed Qutb

“Islam wishes to destroy all states and governments anywhere on the face of the earth which are opposed to the ideology and program of Islam regardless of the country or the nation which rules it. The purpose of Islam is to set up a State on the basis of its own ideology and program.” — Syed Abul A’ala Maududi

Just as our Constitution of the United States binds and identifies us as a single political and legal union of non-contiguous states, territories, political groups, and people, so the Koran binds and identifies all Islamic nations and all Muslims as a single political and legal union of non-contiguous nations, territories, political groups and people, regardless of geographic boundaries, whose seat of power is the occupied Kabah. All Islamic Imams, in every mosque everywhere in the world, are bound to the Koran as supreme law.

As we have seen, Islamic law gives Islamic Imams the power to order Muslims to fighting. The German Max Weber, who had considerable influence on international law and politics, defined “state” as that entity that has a “monopoly on the legitimate use of physical force within a given territory.”

Islam declares that the Koran and Sharia law are divine, and, as such, are the only “legitimate” law in the world. In that way, Islam “self-legitimizes” its right to use physical force anywhere in the world, and the right of every Imam in every mosque in the world to call for physical force and violence at any time. This makes every Imam in every mosque a military leader.

Islam is a state by every definition and theory, and is a state hostile to and at war with the United States of America and its Constitution.

Mosques and Treason and Sedition Against the U.S.

Islam’s political documents and law call for the overthrow of our Constitution and our man-made laws, and therefore for the overthrow of our government, which by definition constitutes sedition and treason. The Islamic documents call for the overthrow of our government—a protector of religious freedom and human rights—through violence:

“I was ordered to fight all men until they say ‘there is no god but Allah.’” —Mohammed’s farewell address, 632

“I have been ordered to fight with the people till they say, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’” —Hadith Sahih Bukhari 4:52:196 Narrated Abu Huraira

“He who fights so that Allah’s Word (Islam) should be superior, then he fights in Allah’s cause.” —Hadith Sahih Bukhari 1:3:125 Narrated Abu Musa

“I asked the Prophet [Mohammed], ‘What is the best deed?’ He replied, ‘To believe in Allah and to fight for His Cause.’” —Hadith Sahih Bukhari 3:46:694 Narrated Abu Dhar

“And fight them till there is no more affliction (i.e. no more worshiping of others along with Allah)”. —Hadith Sahih Bukhari 6:60:40 Narrated Nafi’

“Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers.” —Koran 3.151

“I am with you: give firmness to the Believers: I will instill terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off them.” —Koran 8:12

“Against them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into (the hearts of) the enemies, of Allah and your enemies, and others besides, whom ye may not know, but whom Allah doth know.” —Koran 8:60

The Koran, as the constitution of Islam and Muslims, is diametrically opposite to the United States Constitution and Bill of Rights. According to Islam and Muslims, the Koran is divine law, uncorrupted and incorruptible, whereas the United States Constitution is man-made and is not infallible, and therefore is corrupt. The U.S. Constitution is the antithesis of the Koran; therefore Muslims have no obligation to obey it.

A mosque in the United States is a command and control center of a foreign political and military state that seeks the overthrow of our government, and an Imam in a mosque is a political and military representative of a foreign state that calls for the overthrow of the United States.

The laws of the United States provide specific criminal penalties for sedition and treason. These laws are not only applicable to those advocating and calling for the overthrow of our Constitution and our government; they are applicable to anyone who gives “aid or comfort” to such declared enemies of the United States, or who “organizes or helps or attempts to organize any society, group, or assembly of persons” so engaged. The terms “organizes” and “organize” extend to “the recruiting of new members, the forming of new units, and the regrouping or expansion of existing clubs, classes, and other units of such society, group, or assembly of persons.”

Mosques are just such units.
______________________

Vijay Kumar is a Republican candidate for U.S. Congress from Tennessee’s 5th District. A native of Hyderabad, India, Mr. Kumar lived in Iran during the 1979 Islamic Revolution, when he came to the United States. A naturalized American citizen, Mr. Kumar has lived in Nashville, Tennessee for 24 years. He has been married to his wife, Robin, a native of Bowling Green, Kentucky, for 27 years, and they have three children, two of whom are adopted.

31 Responses

  1. […] Uma mesquita é um instrumento de acção política do Islamismo enquanto principio de ordem política. O Islamismo não é uma religião como as outras: é um princípio de ordem política. Uma mesquita afirma o território da soberania da ordem política islâmica que substitui o Estado de Direito pela Sharia. […]

  2. zaid sofi
    |

    😀 oh christianx listen uh cant stop our Deen E Islam from spreadin worldwide,you are hell followers n you will go to hell n hell is waiting for those who refuses that our beloved Prophet MUHAMMAD saw iz the Messenger of Allah swt….Only tell meah uh christianx where from our Holy Quran came n itx ol believin dat ur Bible is man written.

  3. jtx
    |

    The United States has for some time had a law validly passed but not enforced that would cover those intending to overthrow the United States government.

    Originally intended for Communists, reading the law makes it very clear that it also correctly applies to those of the Islamic “persuasion”.

    The law is 8 USC 1424. Google it up as they say. It seems that it is time to enforce this law as well as others.

  4. Fatima
    |

    This total website is wrong and it is spreading the wrong Islamic message but whatever u non muslims can do should do because u can’t stop Islam from spreading by just a blog or website

  5. Armed Infidel
    |

    wajiha,

    I have no desire whatsoever to “talk to you on your email plz…”

    As I told Mr. Harsoor in an earlier post, I would prefer to keep all of my comments in a public venue so that others may participate as well.

    Since we are on Mr. Warner’s Political Islam website, and since all of you ((shumaila, lubna, Mr. Harsoor, and anoyuoums) are obviously misunderstanders of Islam, here is my suggestion – show some respect by reading Mr. Warner’s writings about Islam and you will begin to understand the true meaning, nature, and intent of Islam…unless of course, you believe that Mr. Warner is one of the “sick dirty shits” that shumaila so eloquently wrote about in her July 27, 2011 post.

    Mr. Warner, thank you for making available not only this comments venue, but for everything you have done to expose the truth about Islam to the world. You are a great American Patriot!

    And finally, this will be the last post that I make in response to Vijay Kumar’s excellent article “THE MUSLIM MOSQUE: A STATE WITHIN A STATE.” I have said all I have to say and it is time to move on.

  6. wajiha
    |

    shumaila ji…Mr amred infedil is not that musch wrong….hey mr armed infedil can you pleaase talk to me on my email plz…
    wajiha_y@yahoo.com

    will wait for your response..

  7. shumaila
    |

    the documented history that u r refering is cosntructed by enemies…to defile islam and its teaching… a more and well esearched work clearly show that islam was tolerant than all religions…u need to read some sane writers rather than these sick dirty shits

  8. shumaila
    |

    mr armed infedil
    ru hindu or what?

  9. anoyoums
    |

    “I’ve found some of the Quran verses in this blog is incomplete or misinterpreted
    ———————————————————————-
    For example:
    “When We decide to destroy a population, We (first) send a definite order to those among them who are given the good things of this life and yet transgress; so that the word is proved true against them: then (it is) We destroy them utterly.” “Koran 17:16

    “We” is meant for the forces of God (which is Allah).

    Muslim couldn’t wage war on a country based on the country’s religion or ideology but war must only be wage if the country attacks first.

    ———————————————————————-
    Ex2:
    “O ye who believe! take not the Jews and the Christians for your friends and protectors: They are but friends and protectors to each other. And he amongst you that turns to them (for friendship) is of them.” “Koran 5:51
    (In arabic the phrase for “your friends and protectors” is actually “your best friend and parents”

    “Fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war)” “Koran 9:5

    (The phrase above pagans or misinterpreted as “musyrikin” musyrikin means the people who show islamic values at the outside while he conceal a darker purpose (Note: This verse is aimed to individuals or groups who used Islam to hide their real purpose Ex: Al-Qaeda & Abu Sayyaf.
    ———————————————————————-

    I’ve coudn’t list all the wrongs in the blog but everything I write here is the truth, I’ve stop here because of the lack of time & If you don’t believe me then check yourself.”

  10. anoyoums
    |

    It is because of the lack of time

  11. anoyoums
    |

    I’ve found some of the Quran verses in this blog is incomplete or misinterpreted
    ———————————————————————-
    For example:
    “When We decide to destroy a population, We (first) send a definite order to those among them who are given the good things of this life and yet transgress; so that the word is proved true against them: then (it is) We destroy them utterly.” “Koran 17:16

    “We” is meant for the forces of God (which is Allah).

    Muslim couldn’t wage war on a country based on the country’s religion or ideology but war must only be wage if the country attacks first.

    ———————————————————————-
    Ex2:
    “O ye who believe! take not the Jews and the Christians for your friends and protectors: They are but friends and protectors to each other. And he amongst you that turns to them (for friendship) is of them.” “Koran 5:51
    (In arabic the phrase for “your friends and protectors” is actually “your best friend and parents”

    “Fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war)” “Koran 9:5

    (The phrase above pagans or misinterpreted as “musyrikin” musyrikin means the people who show islamic values at the outside while he conceal a darker purpose (Note: This verse is aimed to individuals or groups who used Islam to hide their real purpose Ex: Al-Qaeda & Abu Sayyaf.
    ———————————————————————-

    I’ve coudn’t list all the wrongs in the blog but everything I write here is the truth, & If you don’t believe me then check yourself.

  12. Armed Infidel
    |

    Wajiha, lubna, and shumaila,

    All of my earlier posts to Mr. Harsoor were not based on my personal opinions or beliefs, but on your very own Islamic doctrine and teachings as found in the Koran and Sunna of Muhammad, as well as the last 1400 years of documented Islamic history. I did not create this hateful, disgusting, and derogatory history…Muslims did.

    Given your recent collective comments, you are all either ignorant of Islam, misunderstanders of Islam, in denial about the truth of Islam, practicing taqiyya, or all of the above.

    It is obvious that your intent here is to admit nothing, deny everything, make counter-accusations, play the victim, and promote lies… none of which I am buying.

    As I stated earlier, Mr. Kumar’s article is brilliantly written and is the unvarnished truth — not out of context! I challenge any of you to prove otherwise.

  13. shumaila
    |

    I found these remarks about reigion and islam and Mohammad as extremly shameful.
    These are the people with hate…and to spread this hate…disgusting enough..

  14. lubna
    |

    Hi all

    Thanks Wajiha for sending me this…these important commnets but very hateful and disgusting.

  15. wajiha
    |

    Mr Armed infidel

    It is extremely difficult to prove one’s claim as True as a person believes it. All religions have various claims and we need to respect their claims.
    I personaly think that most of the muslims do not interpret Islam as intolerant. Rather many point out Islam as the most tolerant religion in the last 1000 years compared to Jewdism and Christainty.
    I do not want to romantice Islam but it is not as bad religion as you painted it. I do not know why would you call the prophet with extremely derogatory terms..

    Anyways we all have different opinions about differetn things.

    Wajiha

  16. Armed Infidel
    |

    Mr. Harsoor,

    While I appreciate your very generous offer, I would prefer to keep my comments in a public venue so that others may participate as well.

  17. harish harsoor
    |

    this website never told me there were so many replies.
    Mr.armed Infidel contact me on h.harsoor@gmail.com

  18. Armed Infidel
    |

    Ladies and Gentlemen,

    It is obvious that Mr. Harsoor, is unable to respond with any meaningful rebuttal to my challenges. All he could say was, “I am a Muslim myself. SO i know that most of the info given here is by virtue of sheer prejudice and ignorance wrt Islamic faith.” This is typical Muslim modus operandi, when challenged they will play the victim (such as we are prejudice against Muslims), accuse us of being ignorant (because we are not Muslims) to the truth about Islam, and protect their ideology with a bodyguard of lies.

  19. Armed Infidel
    |

    Mr. Harsoor,

    Here is another challenge for you.

    Will you, here and now, condemn Hamas and Hezbollah as Islamic terrorist organizations?

  20. Armed Infidel
    |

    Mr. Harsoor,

    I’m still waiting!!!

    Which “historical records” prove your point that Mr. Kumar was lying when you claim (incorrectly) that,”THE KABAH IN MECCA WAS NOT BUILT AS AN ISLAMIC MOSQUE. It was an ancient temple that had been shared by polytheists, Christians, Jews, and Hindus, honoring 360 different deities. In 630 A.D. the Kabah was captured by Islam in its military invasion and conquest of Mecca.”…is one huge LIE. The Ka’bah was built by Abraham(pbuh). It wasn’t built by Polytheists,… which Mr.Kumar mentions. Historical records prove the point. Do Carbon dating if ya wish!”

    What are the historical records you are referring to? Koran, Sira, Hadith, the Tora, something else? What does carbon dating have to do with your inability to make your argument?

    You have actually made my point, for me by not being able to provide one single shred of, “wonderful” and detailed example and clarification of those “things” that Mr Kumar took “perfectly” out of context?”

    And this is problem you and all other Muslims face when trying to hide the ugly truth by way of lies and propaganda. The ugly truth about the 1400 year old history of Islam is known, and there is nothing that your taqiyya can do to change it, no matter how hard you try. Must be very frustrating for you…

    I’m still waiting!!!

  21. Armed Infidel
    |

    Mr. Harsoor,

    I am not a Muslim myself, but I have studied it in detail and in-depth for over 10 years, and it is the special area of emphasis within my graduate studies in Terrorism and Counterterrorism. Moreover, I have worked anti-terrorism at the highest levels of our national security for over 20 years. One does not have to be a Muslim to understand the truth. I hate to deflate your “taqiyya bubble of sacred deceit,” but Mr. Kumar’s article, as you claim is not based upon “sheer prejudice and ignorance.” Mr. Kumar’s article is based on Islamic core doctrine as spelled out clearly in your core doctrine and theology, that being the Koran, Sira, and Hadith. Perhaps you should go back and study your own ideology again because you are obviously a “misunderstander of Islam.”

    Again, “Concerning your earlier November 19, 2010 comments, I challenge you to provide some “wonderful” and detailed examples and clarifications of those “things” that Mr Kumar took “perfectly” out of context!”

  22. Armed Infidel
    |

    Dear Mr. Harsoor,

    Mr. Harsoor, it is clear that you are unable to provide any “wonderful” and detailed examples and clarifications of those “things” that Mr Kumar took “perfectly” out of context?” Why am I am not surprised? I have asked the impossible of you! Even if you had wanted to, you would not be able to refute the truth by anything other than more propaganda and lies.

    One does not have to be a Muslim to understand the truth about Islam. I have been studying Islam for over 10 years and understand the ugly and shameful truth about Islam (as so clearly explained in Islamic core doctrinal texts the Koran, Sira, and Hadith), not the sugar-coated and whitewashed propaganda as spewed by Muslims like you, the apologist/dhimmi mainstream media, and our willfully ignorant apologist/dhimmi political elites. Islam is NOT a “religion of peace that has been hijacked, twisted, and distorted by a few ‘radicals’ from within.” Rather, Islam is a homophobic and intolerant 7th Century totalitarian ideology of hatred, deceit, misogyny, pedophilia, anti-semitism, slavery, terrorism, murder, rape, humiliation, control, domination, submission, and the annihilator of all native non-Muslim cultures that it dominates. Over the last 1400 years over 270 million Kafirs have been murdered in the name of Islam, making Islam much more dangerous to Kafirs than Nazism and Communism combined. Your so-called prophet Muhammad was nothing more than, as Geert Wilders recently wrote, “a savage leader of a gang of robbers from Medina without scruples who looted, raped, and murdered. Furthermore, Muhammad was a narcissist, a pedophile, a mass murderer, a terrorist, a misogynist, a lecher, a cult leader, a madman, a rapist, a torturer, an assassin and a looter.” Your so-called “only god in the universe” Allah, was nothing more than a fabrication from Muhammad’s sick mind as a tribal moon god from the Quraysh tribe.

    The fact that you are a Muslim indicates to me that you are required to wage jihad against the Kafirs by attempting to hide the truth by way of Islamic “taqiyya,” or sacred deceit against Mr. Kumar. Yours, however, is a failed attempt at obfuscating the truth. As you know, Muslims cannot handle the truth, they consider it to be “criticism” and/or blasphemy and Muslims cannot handle “criticism” of any kind about their “religion of peace.” I’m sure you remember how your fellow Muslims got outraged and waged jihad when cartoons of Muhammad were printed in Danish newspapers several years ago? Death threats, violence, hatred, attempted murder!! Is this your “religion of peace” in action? Unfortunately, due to America’s irrational political correctness and multicultural sensitivities, the truth about Islam has become the new hate speech. Anyone who speaks the ugly truth about Islam is character-assasinated and immediately attacked, marginalized, and labeled as a ‘racist’ (what race is Islam anyway?), a ‘bigot’, ‘hate-monger’, or a recently-coined term by the Muslim Brotherhood ‘Islamophobic.’ The term “Islamophobia” is a misnomer and actually does not make sense. A phobia is an irrational fear, and there is nothing irrational about speaking out against the threat posed by Islam and its “Soldiers of Allah.” The term should be more appropriately named “Islamo-realist.”

    Your Islamic “stealth jihad” in America is doomed to failure, because the truth about Islam is being exposed and Americans are waking up from their deep sleep and ignorance about Islam. More and more Americans are coming to realize that Islam is the enemy within. At the end of the day, Islam will be destroyed – mark my words…

  23. Harish Harsoor
    |

    For ex,the very first line:
    “THE KABAH IN MECCA WAS NOT BUILT AS AN ISLAMIC MOSQUE. It was an ancient temple that had been shared by polytheists, Christians, Jews, and Hindus, honoring 360 different deities. In 630 A.D. the Kabah was captured by Islam in its military invasion and conquest of Mecca.”…is one huge LIE.
    The Ka’bah was built by Abraham(pbuh). It wasn’t built by Polytheists,… which Mr.Kumar mentions. Historical records prove the point. Do Carbon dating if ya wish!

  24. Harish Harsoor
    |

    I am a Muslim myself. SO i know that most of the info given here is by virtue of sheer prejudice and ignorance wrt Islamic faith.

  25. Armed Infidel
    |

    Concerning Mr. Harsoor’s earlier November 19, 2010 comments, I challenge Mr. Harsoor to provide some “wonderful” and detailed examples and clarifications of those “things” that Mr Kumar took “perfectly” out of context!

  26. Armed Infidel
    |

    In response to Harish Harsoor’s comments, “A wonderful example of things taken “perfectly” out of context,” it is clear that Mr. Harsoor is willfully ignorant about Islam. Vijay Kumar’s article is brilliantly written and is the unvarnished truth — not out of context! The problem with Mr. Harsoor is that he is a typical Muslim who cannot handle the truth or criticism about Islam. Keep spreading the truth Mr. Kumar, you are a true American patriot!

  27. Harish Harsoor
    |

    A wonderful example of things taken “perfectly” out of context.
    Thank you.

  28. Dan
    |

    If you search online for “Kabah”, most likely you’ll find the Mayan Kabah ==> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kabah_(Maya_site)
    The “Kabah” in Mecca is also spelled “Ka’bah”, “Ka’aba”, or “Kaaba” ==> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaaba

  29. How can we get the West to understand what a mosque really is? Our education system is pushing in the opposite direction, and our young people are being brainwashed into future dhimmitude!

  30. Alice De
    |

    Thank you, Mr. Kumar for this article. My wish is for more politicians to recognise what is really happening in these mosques. Please continue to educate the American people. You are a hero in this war!

  31. Democracyistheanswer
    |

    Vijay Kumar has done a good job of illustrating the political agenda residing in every mosque: world conquest and Islamic overlordship.

    Apparently, Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip ErdoÄŸan agrees. That is why Erdogan recited a poem that went as follows:

    “The minarets are our bayonets; the domes are our helmets Mosques are our barracks, the believers are soldiers This holy army guards my religion Almighty Our journey is our destiny, the end is martyrdom.”

    Islam is an army and mosques are armories. Islamic prayer takes place in a manner similar to troops doing close order drill, shoulder to shoulder.

    According to various reports, at least 80% of U.S. Mosques follow or are funded by the Wahhabi sect of Saudi Arabia. Among other things, the official sect of Saudi Arabia believes it is a “religious obligation” to hate Christians and Jews and to think of the United States as “enemy
    territory.” Saudi school texts teach hatred of kafirs and are used in mosque-affiliated schools in the US.

    In 2006, Bernard Lewis, one of the world’s leading scholars on Islam, called Wahhabism, “The most radical, the most violent, the most extreme and fanatical version of Islam.” source: http://www.jihadwatch.org/ (September 25, 2007)

Leave a Reply

We require registration to prevent excessive automated spam commenting.