Islam: The Universal Empire of Savagery, Sophistry, and Sacrilege
By Panini
Islam wishes to destroy all states and governments
anywhere on the face of the earth which are opposed to the ideology and program of Islam, regardless of the country or the nation which rules it. The purpose of Islam is to set up a state on the basis of its own ideology and program. …
Islam requires the earth—not just a portion, but the whole planet.
—Syed Abul A’ala Maududi, Jihad in Islam
I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve.
Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them.
—Muhammad; Quran 8:12
The “ideology and program of Islam” named by Syed Maududi is total world domination. The means to achievement of that “ideology and program of Islam” include any means necessary, no matter how brutal, no matter how savage. Such Islamic savagery has played out on the world stage almost daily for over 1,400 years, and has been visited on every continent, every culture, every nation, state, and government on Earth.
In the realm of rationalism, glorifying Islam as “religion” is self-serving sophistry. Islam, by its own decrees, is totalitarianism irrevocably devoted to conquering and overthrowing every nation on Earth.
In the sanctuaries of sanctity, praising Islam as “religion” is a suppurating sacrilege. Islam, by its own open admission, is totalitarianism irrevocably devoted to eradicating every religion on Earth.
In no arena of human endeavor is Islam otherwise than a brutal beheading of freedom of thought, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of choice, self-determinism, literacy, intellect, empiricism, justice, decency, and humanity. Those who have lost their heads to Islam already had lost their minds by embracing it or advocating for it as “religion.” That is the advocacy of savagery. That is an advocacy of ignorance.
Supreme Court justice Sonia Sotomayor secured a permanent place in the Advocacy of Ignorance Annals when she advocated from the bench by uttering this prejudicial sophistry and sacrilege in the Supreme Court of the United States[V1] :
President Trump has never disavowed any of his prior statements about Islam. Instead, he has continued to make remarks that a reasonable observer would view as an unrelenting attack on the Muslim religion and its followers.
—Sotomayor, J., dissenting, Trump v. Hawaii
Her pious prior assumption and imperious proclamation that Islam is a religion is, itself, an “unrelenting attack” on all religions everywhere in the world, and—perhaps worse—on all rational thought by reasonable observers. In fact, you will search the entire Trump v. Hawaii SCOTUS ruling in vain for the slightest scrap of evidence or precedent to support such an asinine prejudiced premise.
Even the majority opinion in the case, expressed by Chief Justice John Roberts, is a paradigm of moral cowardice because he entirely evades this central seminal issue: Is Islam a “religion”?
Islam cannot possibly be named or classified as a “religion” by any reasonable observer, because the “ideology and program of Islam” is diametrically opposed, in every relevant way, to the freedoms and rights guaranteed under the Constitution of the United States—which any honest and rational address to the US Constitution proves conclusively:
· Islam forbids separation of church and state; the First Amendment of the Constitution requires it.
· Islam forbids freedom of religion; the First Amendment defends it.
· Islam suppresses freedom of speech; our First Amendment guarantees it.
· Islam strips man of the right to trial by jury, due process, and freedom from self-incrimination; our nation’s forefathers bled and died to preserve these precious rights, memorialized in our Fifth, Sixth, and Seventh Amendments.
· Islam commands cruel and unusual punishments; our Eighth Amendment forbids them.
· Islam proclaims that all human beings are slaves to Allah and to Islamic leaders; our supreme law abolished slavery and involuntary servitude with the Fourteenth Amendment.
In short, Islam is the single most authoritarian, oppressive, and consummate enemy to our cherished God-given rights and freedoms, guaranteed by our Constitution, that this nation has ever faced.
That is not a “religion;” that is a political totalitarianism whose ultimate stated goal is to wipe actual religion from the face of the Earth, and to make every knee bend in submission to Islamic hegemony—and to Islam alone.
The section of the US Constitution that does apply precisely and relevantly to “the ideology and program of Islam” is Article IV, Section 4, which says (bold emphasis added):
The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against invasion; and … against domestic Violence.
Instead of the Supreme Court correctly declaring Islam to be the hostile and often violent invading force that it is—devoted to destroying the very Constitution that the Supreme Court is sworn to uphold and protect—the court sat by in robes of pusillanimity and allowed Sotomayor to proclaim from the bench her own prejudice that Islam is a religion.
Even the most cursory consultation to Islamic texts and Islam’s own lionized leaders—if such consultation is done honestly and without bias—proves beyond the vaguest hint or shadow of doubt, to any moderately rational human being, that the “ideology and program of Islam” is the greatest existential threat to fundamental rights and freedoms that the United States, and indeed the world, has ever faced:
Islam is a revolutionary ideology and program which seeks to alter the social order of the whole world and rebuild it in conformity with its own tenets and ideals. “Muslim” is the title of that International Revolutionary Party organized by Islam to carry into effect its revolutionary program. … Islam wishes to destroy all states and governments anywhere on the face of the earth which are opposed to the ideology and program of Islam, regardless of the country or the nation which rules it. The purpose of Islam is to set up a state on the basis of its own ideology and program. … Islam requires the earth—not just a portion, but the whole planet.
—Syed Abul A’ala Maududi, Jihad in Islam, leading Pakistani Islamic Philosopher of 20th Century.
It is the nature of Islam to dominate, not to be dominated, to impose its law on all nations and to extend its power to the entire planet. … Islam does not recognize geographical boundaries, nor does it acknowledge racial and blood differences, considering all Muslims as one Umma [nation] … Every inch of land inhabited by Muslims is their fatherland.
—Hasan al-Banna, founder of Muslim Brotherhood
All Muslims form a single nation.
—Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran
A Muslim has no nationality except his belief. One should accept the Sharia without any question and reject all other laws in any shape or form. This is Islam. There is no other meaning of Islam.
—Syed Qutb, Egyptian Islamic Theorist
The Ikhwan [Muslim Brotherhood] must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and sabotaging its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers.
—Muslim Brotherhood, “General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America”
Islam cannot be separated from the state because it guides us through every detail of running the state and our lives. Muslims have no choice but to reject secularism for it excludes the law of Allah … Separation of religion and state is not an option for Muslims.
—Dr. Ja`far Sheikh Idris, Sudanese Muslim Philosopher
There is only one law which ought to be followed, and that is the Sharia.
—Syed Qutb
The Quran is our Constitution.
—Credo of the Muslim Brotherhood
The mosques are our barracks. And the believers our Army.
—Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan
Mosques … are used as a recruitment center, for backdoor meetings, transfer of arms and cash, and putting together terrorist activities.
—CIA agent Reza Khalili
When you are called (by the Muslim ruler) for fighting, go forth immediately.
—Muhammad; Hadith, Bukhari 52:79; Narrated Ibn ‘Abbas
If the Imam calls a group of people to arms, they are obliged to join his military forces.
—Ibn Qudama, al-Mughni[V2]
When anyone studies a little or pays a little attention to the rules of Islamic government, Islamic politics, Islamic society and Islamic economy he will realize that Islam is a very political religion. Anyone who will say that religion is separate from politics is a fool; he does not know Islam or politics.
― Ruhollah Moosavi Khomeini
You don’t have to be a Supreme Court justice to understand a blatant in-your-face declaration of open hostility and warfare against you, your family, your nation, your sovereignty, your Constitution, your laws, your culture, and your very life, do you? You clearly understand the unmistakable meaning of the above statements, don’t you?
Then from what well of willful ignorance, from what cesspool of propaganda and prejudice, does Sonia Sotomayor rise up like Leviathan in borrowed robes to lecture down to thee and me that Islam is a religion?
Sotomayor, and Roberts, and every other Supreme Court justice is bound by this oath (bold all caps emphasis added):
I, _________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will SUPPORT AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES AGAINST ALL ENEMIES, FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC; that I WILL BEAR TRUE FAITH AND ALLEGIANCE TO THE SAME; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.
Islam is blatantly, openly, expressly dedicated to DESTROYING THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES, TO OVERTHROWING THE UNITED STATES, AND TO MAKING SUBMISSIVE SUBJECTS OF ITS PEOPLE. There cannot possibly be any more precise definition of ENEMY. Only those most willfully and blindly ignorant fall for the idiotic insistence that this militantly savage and antagonistic universal empire called Islam is religion.
To defend Islam as a “religion” using the protections of the very Constitution that Islam has vowed to destroy is either insane, suicidal, incomprehensibly ignorant, viciously evil, or all of the above.
It also is treason on its face against the United States and its Constitution. Islam and the United States Constitution are mutually exclusive. Anyone claiming that these diametrically opposed ideologies can “co-exist” is putting on a clown show.
Islam is a totalitarian militancy founded upon the fanaticism of Arab supremacy, with one and only one goal: total political and militaristic domination of the world, including the eradication of every manmade constitution, every manmade law, every manmade nation, and every world religion.
Muhammad Is the Genghis Khan of Ideology
Islam was created solely on seventh-century Arab savagery by a seventh-century Arab. Muhammad was motivated by Arab supremacy, and his every action proves it.
The only valid comparisons to Muhammad are Genghis Khan, Josef Stalin, Adolf Hitler, Idi Amin, Pol Pot, and other murderous despots of their ilk. That is the only group that Muhammad can stand with. His inarguable history of wholesale robbery, enslavement, slaughter, and genocide forever forbids him from standing even in the shadows of religious and philosophical leaders such as Jesus of Nazareth, Socrates, Siddhartha Gautama (Buddha), Lao Tzu, Confucius, or Socrates.
Muhammad’s “creed”—of incontrovertible record—included armed robbery, rape, assault, deceit, pedophilia, polygamy, brutality, murder, slavery, chaos, and destruction. When those who he wanted to dominate would not readily bow down before his despotic degeneracy, he wrapped it up in the robes of “religion”—every last precept of which he knowingly plagiarized from the existing religions of Judaism, Christianity, and polytheism.
Islam seeks only to crush the human spirit and all of mankind into absolute submission. Its very name, Islam, means, literally, “submission.” Anyone who calls Islam a “religion” commits the greatest blasphemy and sacrilege possible against humanity, decency, and rational thought.
Although Muhammad was a ruthless warlord, over-the-ramparts slaughter was never his only method of invasion and conquest. He learned early on how to infiltrate his spies and agents into the inner circles of intended victims through his most deadly tactic of tyranny: “immigration.”
Invasion by Demographics: The Trojan Horse of Islamic Refugeeism
Sophia Lösche was a bubbly 28-year-old doe-eyed do-gooder, the quintessential bleeding-heart liberal, when she stuck her thumb out in June of 2018 and hitched a ride to an early grave. Before that, she had employed her doe eyes and do-goodness in volunteer work for one of the globalist non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in Greece, blithely helping wave after wave of Islamic “refugees” invade Europe from Africa and from other fanatically Islamic hellholes—most of the “refugees” curiously being males of fighting age, often masquerading as “children.”
She was back in her home nation of Germany on that June day in 2018 when, all smiles, she climbed up into a truck with Moroccan plates that stopped for her in Schkeuditz, East Germany, where she was hitching to get to her home in Bamberg.
She never arrived. Instead, she was brutally raped, murdered, mutilated, burned, and unceremoniously dumped in the woods near a gas station in Bilbao, Spain.
Her murderer was a Moroccan Muslim trucker named Boujemaa L. He was arrested in another city in Spain, Bailén, as he was attempting to flee to Gibraltar, where he hoped to board a ferry to Morocco to escape the reach of European law. Once caught, he confessed his crime and told the authorities where to find her body.
Sophia could be the poster child for the shuddering, teeth-chattering naïveté of liberals and “progressives” totally self-absorbed in their own holier-than-thou do-goodness toward Islam and Muslims. They believe that all rabid dogs are sweet little baby bunnies, so clutch them to their breast.
Sophia is by no means the only such victim of European open-borders, open-arms suicide-by-Islam. Another such liberal darling-heart was a 19-year-old pro-immigrant activist named Maria Ladenburger. She was raped and murdered in Germany by an Afghan Muslim “asylum seeker” named Hussein Khavari. In what could be an especially vicious twist of the knife of Fate, he had come to Germany through Greece—the very place where Sophia Lösche had worked as a volunteer helping such “refugees” get through the guardless gateway into Europe.
These are merely two tragic anecdotal tales out of far too many to count from the relentless, inexorable, and very well coordinated invasion-by-immigration of Muslims into the Western nations that Islam is sworn to overwhelm and overthrow.
From 2006 to 2018 close to 6 million Muslims from the Middle East, sub-Saharan Africa, Afghanistan, Iran, and Pakistan joined in this invasion of Europe as “asylum seekers,” according to Eurostat. They were mostly young military aged men.
A report by DW Akademie gives some glimpse into the kinds of corruption that creeps in along with the Muslims, saying that a former official of Germany’s Federal Office for Migration and Refugees is under investigation for allegedly accepting bribes from as many as 2,000 “refugees” to grant them asylum.
Islam’s grand universal jihad is systematically destroying European culture and civilization, nation by nation, town by town, neighborhood by neighborhood—just as Muslims have been systematically doing to every nation they have come into contact with for over 1,400 year. But that’s been Islam’s “ideology and program” all along.
Central Asia—including all of the “-stans” that were in the former Soviet Union—was once Buddhist; Iran was Zoroastrian; Turkey was Greek; Afghanistan was Buddhist: Pakistan was Hindu; Indian Kashmir was Hindu. All are now demographically, politically, and militarily conquered by Islam.
Unless something effective is done, Europe is next. Islamic demographic invasion is already ripping apart the social fabric of once beautiful and peaceful European cultures.
After unspeakable irresponsibility by Sweden’s government in admitting swarms of Muslims, Palemo, Sweden, is now the rape capital of the world. In Denmark, 10 out of every 12 rapes is committed by migrants mainly from Islamic hotbeds such as Somalia, Iraq, and Eritrea, according to Defend Europa. That should come as no surprise, because in Islam, women are chattel, property, sex toys that Muslim men can enter whenever and however they choose.
In England, the fates of a still-untold number of young girls have been abandoned to Muslim “grooming gangs.” That’s the current “politically correct” euphemism for gangs of Muslim thugs who have come into England by immigration, often as “refugees.” They lure teenage girls—or younger—into cars or apartments, ply them with liquor and drugs, and then serially gang rape them.
Demographic conquest is absolute. Demographic conquest is irrevocable. Demographic conquest brings about not just destruction, but ultimately the eradication of the host country and its culture, to be replaced by Islamic “culture.”
Islam is not the fastest growing movement; it is the fastest breeding movement. Its ever-escalating numbers place an unbearable burden on the host states where it invades. As only one example, The Telegraph recently reported that “half of Muslim men and three quarters of Muslim women are unemployed” in the UK. That is utterly overwhelming the welfare coffers, all of it being sucked out of the pockets and bank accounts of hardworking Brits.
This is exactly how any parasite works to overwhelm and choke the life out of a host. On the current path, Islam will overwhelm and choke the life out of Europe demographically. Once it does, Islam will, as always, infiltrate and insinuate its agents into key political positions, and will soon dominate Europe politically.
Unless that process is forcibly stopped, Europe will fall, to be replaced by Islam and Sharia law.
Islam then will possess all the military might it needs, including nuclear capabilities, to launch an all-out war on the rest of mankind. This is Islam’s strategy. It not only is carrying that strategy out successfully, but is being helped in accomplishing its conquest by the European Union.
Obviously and inarguably, that is open treason by the EU against its member nations. A few of the nations, such as Italy and Poland, have begun to see the light and slam the door on Islamic invasion-by-immigration. Unless other nations in Europe can be slapped out of their comas, and mount a coordinated campaign to fully stop the onslaught, nations such as Italy and Poland ultimately could be overwhelmed by their very own European neighbors, once those are taken over by Islam.
Europe is not Islam’s only target for conquest; Europe currently is merely the easiest pickings for Islam because of the EUs suicidal open-borders, open-arms policies. But the same vicious process is going on right this minute in the United States.
At the time of this writing, over 100 Muslims are running for public office in 2018 on the Democratic ticket in the US. In full open betrayal of the United States, some politicians and political organizations are actively promoting Muslims into positions of power.
That sort of political treason is bad enough, but perhaps the most viciously crushing betrayal is coming out of the very temples and churches of traditional religions that Islam has vowed to wipe off of the face of the Earth.
Do not take the Jews and the Christians for friends.
—Muhammad; Quran 5:51
Whoever desires a religion other than Islam, it shall not be accepted from him.
—Muhammad; Quran 5:51
Do not greet the Jews and the Christians before they greet you and when you meet any one of them on the roads force him to go to the narrowest part of it.
—Muhammad; Hadith: Sahih Muslim (2167)
The stones and trees will say O Muslims, O Abdullah, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him.
—Muhammad; Hadith: Sahih Muslim, 41:6985
Do not choose those outside your [Muslim] community as intimate friends. … You have more right to hate them than they to hate you. Say, “Die in your rage!”
—Muhammad; Ibn Ishaq 388
Act like you are his friend. Then kill him.
—Sheik Muburak Gilani, founder of Jamaat ul-Fuqra, explaining how to kill American infidels
For sheer xenophobic hatred, it’s hard to beat Islam, its Arab supremacy racism, and its god-complex sense of superiority and jealous rage over every religion that ever existed.[MOU3]
After Muhammad had raised a terrifying army and invaded his old hometown of Mecca for revenge, one of his first acts was to storm into the Kaaba, which for centuries had been a holy shrine for Christians, Jews, and polytheists alike. There he took his staff and smashed every idol and artifact of the polytheists, Christians, and Jews, declaring the Kaaba to be his and Islam’s exclusive property—merely one more thing he stole.
Apologists for Islam seem to camp out in every public forum ready to leap to the defense of the garbled language of the Quran and the Hadith whenever a merely rational human being points out factually that the tortured texts of Islam mandate slavery, rape, wife abuse, pedophilia, beheading, maiming, terrorism, cruelty, slaughter, and genocide.
It’s always the same tired, miserable apologist script: “Oh, that’s the wrong translation from Arabic,” or, “Oh, you have taken that out of context,” or, “Oh, no, you have to know the entire history of seventh century Arabia to understand what Allah, speaking through Muhammad, really meant,” or, “Oh, poor infidel, you are too stupid and faithless to perceive the divine ultimate truth in the words of Allah speaking through Muhammad.”
If the “divine text” you choose for guidance in life is so inarticulate, ambiguous, and esoteric in meaning that it can be “interpreted” a thousand different ways to suit any purpose at all—including terrorism and world domination—then you might as well be using tea leaves, Tarot cards, or fortune cookies for your “divine” guidance. Or maybe go listen to the voices in your head coming from the neighbor’s little black dog, the way “Son of Sam” David Berkowitz did for his mystical guidance.
For the more rational people in the world, for secular humanists, for responsible adults: To hell with mysticism and metaphysics, all of it—including every hell every imagined. There is no room for theology and for the pie-in-the-sky metaphysics when facing an existential threat from wave after wave of Arab supremacist hordes who are happy to slit your throat and rape your wives and daughters on their stomp-and-romp to world domination.
The West must reject every mystical claim made by Islam and Quran. Such claims are utterly irrelevant to the values and to the very existence of Western civilization.
Islam must be faced and judged empirically, logically, rationally, by its actions and by the results of its actions, not by some airy-fairy metaphysics. Uniformly, for 1,400 years, Islam and its followers have proven themselves, empirically, to be barbaric invading hordes that destroy all religions, all cultures, all civilizations that they come into contact with.
History is strewn with the rubble of Buddhist, Hindu, Zoroastrian, Christian, Jewish and polytheistic churches, synagogues, temples, shrines, and artifacts, all smashed, burned, exploded, and destroyed by Islam in its monomaniacal rampage to wipe out of existence any religion or state that will not bow down and submit to its savagery.
As for politics, the charade of “democracy” in any Islamic-conquered nation is the biggest fraud ever perpetrated on mankind. The pitiable charade of “democracy” is ridiculous when the people have no choice, and the people in an Islamic nation never have any choice at all except more Islam. Dipping your finger in purple dye is not freedom.
Muslims are the FIRST victims of Islam. They are enslaved to Islam. They have never known anything resembling actual freedom of the mind, of the soul, of the spirit. They have never known freedom of speech, freedom of religion, or freedom of choice in the political systems that subjugate them.
As only one example of the savage injustices meted out by Islam daily around the world, Human Rights Watch recently reported that on 9 July 2018, “Shaparak Shajarizadeh, who took her headscarf off in public in January to protest compulsory hijab laws, announced on her Instagram page that a court sentenced her to 20 years in prison for this act, although it suspended 18 years of the sentence, meaning she has to serve 2 years in prison.”
Maybe you have trouble grasping that, so here it is again: An Iranian woman who took off a headscarf in public has been sentenced by a Sharia “court” to 20 years in prison for taking off a scarf, of which sentence she will have to serve at least two years. In prison. For taking off a scarf.
Meanwhile, “moderate” Muslims like Linda Sarsour (literally “cockroach” in Arabic) use the protection of our Constitution, our laws, our largesse, to get out into our streets and berate us for not implementing the slavery of Sharia right now in our courts.
Islam is slavery. Islam is sophistry. Islam is sacrilege. Only the most foolish and uninformed would even attempt to take any other position. Islam, empirically, is the antireligion, the anticivilization, and the single most virulent threat to freedom that has ever existed anywhere in the world.
Nazism and Communism were patty-cake flashes in the pan compared to “the ideology and program of Islam.” Islam is more noxious, malignant, and deadly to the principles of freedom and democracy than all of Nazism and Communism combined. Neither of those militant totalitarian ideologies had the fanatical metaphysics that Islam possesses, and that it uses to constantly—five times daily—fan the flames of fanaticism.
There are post-Communist liberal democratic countries; there are post-Nazi and post-Fascist liberal democracies.
But there are no post-Islamic countries in the world.
Eternal War: The True Legacy of Islam
There has never been a single instant since Islam’s creation that Islam has not been at war in pursuit of conquest and absolute domination of the world.
That statement has nothing to do with the United States, or with any of the existing nations of the European continent, or with Great Britain, or with any Western nation state—because not a single one of them even existed when Muhammad declared war on the entire world.
That single fact blows into a smoking cloud the ineffably absurd whining lies of liberals and Muslims that the reason Muslims launch hateful terrorist attacks and warfare is that they have been poor peaceful victims being picked on by the United States and Western nations.
Islam has been wreaking warfare, terrorism, and genocide for over 1,400 years. It began over a thousand years before the United States of America even existed.
The United States got sucked into Islam’s eternal wars because Islam attacked the United States repeatedly on United States soil, and repeatedly attacked allies of the United States. Falling into the traps of Islam’s wars was the wrong answer to Islam, so of course the Afghanistan and Iraq wars, and now the Syrian war, all have failed, with a staggering cost in blood and treasure.
The United States has been in Afghanistan for 17 years, in Iraq for over 15 years, and is now embroiled in Syria.
We have spent nearly $6 trillion—that’s trillion, with a T—and have lost over 10,000 men and women. At least 50,000 men and women have wounded in these wars.
What have we accomplished? Nothing. In fact, it’s less than nothing: To show the absolute mockery of our values that has been made from our blood and treasure, during this same period officials of the US government helped draft the constitutions of Iraq and Afghanistan, and in those constitutions Sharia is the foundational law of the both countries.
One reason we have failed is because we called it a “War on Terror.” It is categorically impossible to have a war on terror. Terrorism is nothing but one method, one means to an end. The entire motivation for Islamic terror and war comes exclusively from the “ideology and program of Islam.”
All wars are ideological. We have failed because we refused to acknowledge the one and only enemy we have in the world.
That enemy is exactly, precisely, as Maudidi named it in the quotation at the very top of this work: the ideology and program of Islam.
That is the enemy. That is the only enemy.
Unless and until we officially, as a nation, name the enemy, and construct an effective strategy for combatting it, there is no hope, ever, of defeating it.
The eternal enemy of the American people, of American values, of the American Constitution, and of fundamental human rights and freedoms throughout the world is the totalitarian ideology and program of Islam.
[V1]
[V2]“When anyone studies a little or pays a little attention to the rules of Islamic government, Islamic politics, Islamic society and Islamic economy he will realize that Islam is a very political religion. Anyone who will say that religion is separate from politics is a fool; he does not know Islam or politics.”
― Ruhollah Moosavi Khomeini
[MOU3]I have changed “Muhammad” in this paragraph to “Islam” in compliance with your instructions not to make critical comments about Muhammad personally.
From the inbox of Bill Warner:
AUTHOR: Anonymous Left-Winger from the UK
I am a leftwing anti-neoliberalist. For the longest time I supported the Palestinian movement in this country and cried when Palestinian children were being killed for supposedly only innocently throwing stones at Israelis. I believed in all that I was being told by my Western liberal leftwing politicians, who knew nothing of Islam. I was a supporter of their movement until I learnt the truth about Mohammed’s creed and its unrelenting religious Jihad against Israel, all over the Muslim World. Islam is the most totalitarian of religions ever brought on earth as it was adopted by humanity through a 1400 year old Conquest of civilisations and total subjugation of human beings down the ages to its slave like bowing creed. There was only one way to worship God, only Mohammed’s way. No other way was deemed acceptable in any comparable way. Christians were enslaved and forced pay a heavy humiliating Jizya tax to Muslims, as that introduced by ISIS on Christians recently, a tax most of them could not even pay. Christians were persecuted down the ages like they still are today all over the Muslim world in one way or another. All Muslims are descended from those oppressed non-Muslims of the past, whose culture they no longer follow, and who they now disrespect so badly to their shame. Throughout the Middle East, Near East, Africa and many parts of the World, anyone wishing to leave the Master-Slave bowing religion of Mohammed is to be killed, even for asking a few innocent questions which can brand him a suspected apostate. It is a religion of total totalitarianism and its Mohammedan Sharia rules for life cover all aspects of life, not only public but private too. In that way, it is more totalitarian than Communism and Nazism ever were. Now these people are coming here to bring us into their fold as Islam teaches them. I studied Islam on my own, how they think. And watched what is happening in the world outside our borders. And it is not looking good for us.
It is interesting to note that Sweden has just sent out to all of its citizens a war preparation manual entitled: “If Crisis or War comes”, explaining what they need to do if something serious happens in their country. Police Chiefs in both Sweden and France are saying they have lost control of order and policing in their countries. They are running out of intelligence officers, they have so many terror suspects to follow. Even Army chiefs are voicing concerns about the level of Jihadists in the country. Ex-Muslims are frantically warning us of upcoming doom, unless we respond now and decisively. Islamists are protesting openly in this country and the West, inciting hatred in front of us. They are doing army training in Muslim countries, arming themselves, calling for the overthrow of our Civilization here and all over the Muslim world. And they are not facing any sanctions let alone execution for sedition against the state, which they deserve, swiftly. They are calling for Holy war against us all over the Muslim world in their mosques and here too, because they say they will get rewarded in paradise for it. Look around you, they want to overthrow our way of life and make us live as Dhimmis, as Christians lived for centuries in Conquered Lands by Islam. They want to overthrow our government, that is all of you politicians! Yes, you, defenders of this creed. Lebanon went down to Islam, as Brigitte Gabriel explained, the head of ACT FOR AMERICA, the biggest anti-Islamization organisation in the World. Lebanon was once a Christian Country, she warned. Then they did what leftist anti-neoliberalists like me were doing – they supported the poor refugees. They supported Palestinians and brought them into the country until those declared war on them and made them heel to Islam. Then the left-wing liberals who marched with the Palestinians, were running to the others asking why they were being slaughtered by the Palestinians they defended. And they were told that they were only ever infidels to them, not ever their true friends.
Remember liberal Iran fell to the Ayatollahs, liberal Afghanistan fell to the Taliban and the list of devastated countries goes on. Are you telling us, we have nothing to fear from Islam, in regards to Islamist takeover, when everyone is too scared to throw any of them out of the country? I do not care if you drop them straight to the destined paradise of Mecca by parachute or even without one, but something has to be done. The enemies of our Civilization are frog marching without fear throughout London as Nazis of old and no-one is arresting them and taking them out of the country. The invaders are already here. Civil War is coming – to Sweden, to France, everywhere. Have you even planned for such a contingency? Are you going to let these people, if you can call them that, trample over our rights and lives? When are you all going to wake up and speak the truth and grow a backbone? Do you even have a plan for what to do with these people if they are not bringing a religion of peace as they claim and maybe just possibly are bringing to us a religion of war and acting like the Muslims of 1400 years of history? And if the moderates are all so keen on reforming Islam, as they say, maybe they go and teach those in Muslim countries how it’s done and what the Islamists are doing wrong theologically speaking. They talk of a different, European, Western Islam, which is a pipe dream with no theology behind it. It was us Westerners, the one who liberated them from the slavery of Islam, who they call simply as Imperialists or Colonialists as if they were never done a favour by our people. It was Westerners who gave them even one whiff of our western freedoms and they liked it. How much freer they would be if they could leave Islam altogether. A Western Islam only exists here because there are enough of us to hold it up for them. It will go down like a lead balloon the more of them are here, unless people are allowed to openly leave the faith here and in Muslim countries, without sanction and can criticize Islam. But you, unknowing Politicians of Western governments, who have read nothing of Islam since 9-11, just approved of Sharia Constitutions in Iraq and elsewhere, without having any idea what you were doing, that is how little you understand their upside-down mindset. But we can teach you, if only you let us.
Islam was at war with civilizations for 1400 years, so do you think there is not even one iota chance that they could be at war with us today on religious grounds and bringing us Mohammed’s holy war? Not all of them but enough to cause serious to our country’s defence and stability and cause overthrow. That is what they did in times past. And now we are considered the haters for questioning Islam’s teachings? By the way, sorry to break the bad news, but Islam does not mean Peace. That word is Salaam. Islam means subjugation to Mohammed and his creed. When they talk of peace, they mean inverted Islamic peace. Peace when you are at one with God when killing infidels as explained to me by Islamists, and the peace that will come when the whole world is submitted to Islam. And these people are all around us. Praying for our downfall in their mosques. Sounds great, doesn’t it? The Minarets are coming to rule over us, but you politicians are showing not one grain of interest in Islam. You politicians should be reading what the Koran is saying right now as if your life depended on it! Because this is what is coming to rule over you and over the lives of your children. Islam and only Islam – the Koran of Mohammed for all time in our lands, with no reprieve from this evil creed. Please forget about learning about Islam from Muslims though, who come only to lie and confuse you. Their inverted God teaches them to deceive for his glory, you see, if you didn’t know. My advice is that you read the Koran from non-Muslims like Robert Spencer, Bill Warner, Serge Trifkovic, and all the many websites written by non-Muslims or ex-Muslims on the Internet, so you understand who your enemy is. The millions of pages on the internet written by infidels explaining Islam you have failed to look at for even a minute. The internet is the only place teaching the truth about Islam and the horrors of its creed, none of which makes it on TV and in the papers. It is the only place where people can still speak the truth on the subject and have a good right moan about it. The freedoms are now to have curbed so that your upside down truth holds up, which it will not for long.
It is time to ban Islam in this country and throughout all Western Countries. If they want to practice it, they can go elsewhere but not here. Islam is an evil creed that teaches that only in killing others and yourself can you get to paradise for certain. It is a religion of total inversion of human values. Muslims can only be here if they are willing to believe in a Monotheism that does not include Mohammed in it. We want to reserve the culture that existed here before Islam started fouling up our whole culture. Islamists are coming to take away our art, statues, music and install only the culture of where we invited them from. They are going to be teaching our kids an upside-down version of life as they teach their kids. Lies, lies and all lies, until lies become the new reality and you are living in the inverted world of Islam – where white is black and black is white because Mohammed said so. And so-called moderate Muslims are only propping up Islamists’ arguments by lying to themselves and us about the true nature of Islam and Mohammed’s character. They might be well meaning but all are inadvertently deceiving the Islamists in a way, as they are not really speaking the truth about Mohammed and his creed. So those Islamists end up believing that the misfortune of their Mohammedan Civilisation is down to them not having been faithful enough to God and not following the example of the first four Caliphs of the 7th Century, the best of generations as Mohammed described them, those who conquered most of North Africa and the Middle and Near East in the most brutal way. They really believe that if they revisit that example on the world, and bring total destruction to our Civilization and people, they will be rewarded by their God with a superior Islamic Golden Age, or hasten the Last Days on this planet. That is what they believe because they all grew up in a place where no-one could openly challenge those viewpoints and give a counterargument to them. Because everyone is scared of this religion of Peace. So moderate Muslims will tell us lies, that Mohammed was a good man, when he certainly was not. And anyone who claims he was a good man deserves to be woken up from the pipe dream, or to be thrown out of this country!
All over the Muslim world, people are still living under the Islamic Inquisition of old. Apostates have to hold their mouths if they want to live, so only the Islamists are afforded a proper voice. Many moderate Muslims it seems want to have it both ways. They are OK about oppressing the infidel Christians on the one hand, instead of affording them rights to spread their faith openly. They would readily throw out their kids and disown them or even kill them as happens in so many majority Muslim countries if they desert the faith. And then they complain that Islamists are getting too powerful on the other side of the equation and killing them as infidels. Here you go. This puffed up balloon of Islamism however can only start being deflated, when people are afforded the rights to leave Islam, so they can see the weakness of its ideology, and discover a different monotheism, much better and kinder for them. They can only do that if they can grow to accept criticism of Islam, which is not to date happening anywhere very much unfortunately. Persecution of Christians is rampant in so many Muslim countries and it will soon show itself here too, mark my words.
I wish things were not as they were, but here we are. You can lock us all up, but we will never surrender to Islam: a creed that teaches that killing yourself and other human beings in the process will lead you to paradise. And that blowing up the whole planet for one person’s salvation (and 72 virgins) is Godly sanctioned. A creed that teaches that having sex with small children is acceptable, that beating your wife is good for her, that enslaving non-Muslim women and raping them is permissible, that brutalizing humans in the way of Mohammed is ever acceptable. If Muslims are not willing to accept that, then they deserve to live somewhere else but not here. We are people of a Judeo-Christian mindset, even if Atheist, not inverted Islamic mindset. We welcome people here but not worshippers of any Evil Cult that is calling for our Civilization overthrow. If our misguided people still want to believe in the illusion of Islam, they are free to move out there and discover the truth for themselves. We wish them all the best with that.
I learnt Islam independently of Tommy Robinson, but I cannot disagree about one line of his on Islam from his book. I wish that as a leftist I could say the opposite of what he said but I cannot. Once can pretend something only for so long, but soon the truth will out and the West is in for a very rude awakening. Heed our warnings, politicians, so we do not all end up enslaved to Islam like those in so many other parts of the world who were overthrown by Islamists. We want to be free, we don’t want to live under Islam. We have been the greatest civilization ever known to man, and we are not going to be defeated by some cult members of an evil creed! Enough of Islam. Ban Islam and their books once and for all so we can regain our voice, which has been so far drummed out by their lies. They are bringing holy war to us and need to know that wars of religion are not going to be tolerated here. They need to hear in no uncertain terms that their creed is wrong and unacceptable for living. When top Swedish army chiefs and security forces who follow threats in their country as they come, can see only bad times are coming for Sweden then there is a problem. And even the most liberal Swede will soon be waking up to the nightmare they created by their own political correct lying on the religion of Islam and its evil creed. May all brave men like Tommy Robinson and all who care for our future be able to wake us all up in time, before it’s all too late to save our great Western Civilization, who so many people have admired for so long down the ages. I pray Tommy will be freed and his book given serious consideration by the government once and for all, instead of proposing 6 year sentences for criticizing this bad religion, which is now planned for us and slanderous accusations of Islamophobia. Thank you.
—————-
Author: Anonymous Leftwinger as I could be sued for writing this by this uneducated government, who knows nothing of Islam and its ideology. But do not worry they will soon know everything of Islam and their ideology when they are overthrown by Mohammed’s holy warriors, getting ready to overthrow them in their mosques all over the country.
The Halcyon Doctrine is a thoughtful approach to the problem of jihad. The author of this piece is Alan Howell Parrot.
It should be noted that the loss of the Kabbah terminates two of the five pillars of Islam — the hajj and the qiblah, the direction of prayer.
Islam’s a religion of peace, so we’re told
by elites so venal and so bold
as to ignore what’s in that book
or misquote what’s clear from just one look.
Multiculturalism is pandemic now.
All cultures, all people are equal . . . and how.
Thus, truthful barbs must never be hurled
at savage imports from the Third World.
Allah’s commands to “fight and slay”
are never discussed in any way
by presenters, editors, and their ilk
since truth is a fly in the buttermilk.
While the slaughter of kaffirs rages worldwide
our chattering classes have turned a blind eye.
Regardless of what Islamists may do,
“It’s only the extremists,” they’ll tell you.
While Mohammedan numbers are still few
They’ll smile while silently cursing you.
It’s called taqiyya, and until time’s right
to deceive you they must be polite.
But should the whip get in their hands
the umma would tyrannize our lands.
Christians, Jews, other kaffir too
would be reduced to dhimmitude.
Islam means submission.
But our ancestors didn’t yield.
They had straight backbones, a strong faith,
and some good swords to wield.
We too may stand our ground.
We needn’t shy away.
If Mohammed comes to fight and slay
cold on a slab he then might lay.
We are Western men.
We’ve defeated them before.
Like Sobieski at Vienna
And Charles Martel at Tours.
This time will be no different,
but our losses may be great
as some won’t face up to the threat
until it is too late.
Western men must take care
if their progeny shall be saved.
Should they not heed history’s warning
more likely they’ll be slaves.
Kenneth Roberts
Imagine a football league where only one team is allowed to score goals or win. That’s the premise of political Islam.
Islam is the only religion with a non-compete clause. Non-compete agreements in today’s business world defend proprietary information. Proprietary ideas give companies their leading edge. Islam goes beyond branding itself ‘the best’ (which all ideologies do) Islam forbids other ideologies from competing with Islam in a number of areas. It’s like a modern corporation, but more ruthless.
Islam’s Unique Idea
Islam’s unique, proprietary idea is jihad, the holy war to eliminate competition with Islam. According to Ibn Khaldun, the holy war of jihad is not permitted to other religions or ideologies.
Non-Compete Regulations
Islam’s non-compete restrictions are summarized in the infamous Pact of Omar and Sharia law. They regulate non-Muslims from competing with Muslim males in the following areas: proselytizing, politics, employment opportunities, social status, prestige or ‘honor’, public events, using the Arabic language, teaching about Islam, marrying Muslim women, the security of possessions and the elegance or height of buildings…even in how the Kafirs dress. Nor may women compete with Muslim males, since Allah made women constitutionally inferior to men ‘in reason and religion’.
Islam’s non-compete restrictions are the Kafirs’ terms of surrender to the Islamic state. The Pact of Omar was made by eighth-century caliphs to be forced on non-Muslims against their wills. Wherever Islamists become the ruling class, the Pact of Omar is dragged out to crush whatever challenges Islamic monopolies. That makes Kafirs and women permanent underclasses in Sharia-ruled societies.
Islamists want to insinuate Sharia into Kafir societies before Kafirs and women are aware of its non-compete implications.
In a Sharia society, non-competition applies everywhere, even in the law courts where Sharia favors the inconvenience, impoverishment and humiliation of Kafirs and the inferior status of women.
How Islam defends non-competition
Islamic non-competition is defended by jihad. Jihad is a monopoly on aggression. Allah forbids Kafirs from resisting jihad in any way, since counterjihad is a way of competing with Islam.
What makes Islam’s non-compete system draconian is the normative means to enforce it: vigilantism. Since murder is reprehensible, Sharia law craftily hides the murder of Kafirs and apostates behind verbiage, mumbo jumbo and silence. Silence should not be overlooked as a powerful legal weapon!
America’s emancipation of slaves did not entirely end slavery. American slavery slyly continued as late as 1928 because no punishment was on the books for slave-owners, even though slavery was illegal. Similarly, Sharia law has no punishment for a vigilante who murders an apostate or a blasphemer. Islamic vigilantes in such cases are ‘killing by right’, that is, Allah authorizes killing apostates and blasphemers on the example of Mohammed. Vigilantes are considered auxiliary police enforcing Allah’s non-compete laws. Such vigilantes are heroes, rather than criminals.
Islam’s top authority on Sharia, the fatwa department of Al Azhar University in Cairo has sanctioned Islamic vigilantism. In theory, the death sentence for blasphemy is imposed by the Islamic state, but if the state isn’t available to act, a private Muslim vigilante may carry out a death sentence against a blasphemer. This is where Islamic law gets interesting. A self-directed vigilante may execute a fatwa issued by an imam, but even a fatwa is not necessary. When a Kafir competes with Islam or its prophet, a vigilante may murder the blasphemer even without a fatwa being issued.
We cannot imagine a Christian pastor issuing a death warrant, yet two hundred thousand imams are authorized to do so and over a billion Muslims are deputized to kill. Many writers and cartoonists around the world (such as Salman Rushdie, Robert Redecker, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Kurt Westergaard, Lars Vilks, Molly Norris, Trey Parker and Matt Stone) have a clear understanding of Islamic vigilantism, since they live with full-time security guards. Almost everyone writing about Islam has received anonymous death threats. Writing about Islam breaches Islam’s non-compete clause.
Results of Non-Compete
The cost of Islam’s non-compete contract is stagnation. ‘Innovation’ (an evil word in Islam) is forbidden, because Islam’s alleged perfection cannot be improved. The 7th century is deemed the time of perfection, so Muslims cannot progress past it. Sharia leads the world backwards to the 7th century, not forwards to progress.
Muslims want to be world leaders, but their non-compete makes them followers. Competition has everything and produces everything that the Islamic world craves and needs for its survival, but the Muslim world produces little because of its philosophy of non-competition.
Jihadists curb their cognitive dissonance by repeating their certainty of Islam’s moral perfection until they all but drown out the images and voices of modernity. They want Islamic terrorism removed from discussion, so that 7th-century-loving Muslims are not contrasted with progress-loving Kafirs. Jihadists live in denial, but many burn out: they half-heartedly see backwardness is not the answer.
What should we do?
First of all, Kafirs need to see Islam’s non-compete clause is a real threat to progress and democratic values. Islamic belief in non-competition means that no progress is needed or possible. But Islam’s allegedly perfect society never existed, unless slavery, misogyny, vigilantism, inequality and genocide are ‘perfect’. Non-competition is bad for people. Societies that imposed monopolies on thought and political power have had cycles of revolution and counter-revolution or have stalled in poverty, disease and superstition.
Secondly, we should fault Islam’s non-compete system because it spreads fear; we should ban jihad because it has caused more than 270 million deaths and always creates tyrannies.
Recognizing political Islam’s dysfunction, today’s Muslims flee from it to live in free non-Islamist countries. Surveys show 65% of Muslims are Islamists in theory, but not in practice. This contradiction is Islam’s Achilles’ heel. Westerners should highlight it, rather than flattering the Islamism of oil-rich countries in order to keep oil prices low.
Mohammed declared endless war on competition giving Muslim males monopolies on everything. Jihadists expect to win this war through high birthrates and terrorism.
Many Western leaders shield jihad and supremacism from ideological scrutiny because they underestimate the pervasiveness of Islamism. Are they fit to lead?
As Islamism spreads, the vibrancy of the competitive world will gradually be dampened by Islam’s non-competition and terrorism.
It is self-refuting to fight the jihadists militarily, without blaming Islam’s non-compete philosophy. Non-competition is what ignites the jihadist culture, so refuting the non-compete philosophy of Islam should be a top priority.
Article in Russian:
http://maxpark.com/community/3788/content/2968535
http://www.translarium.info/2014/09/islams-non-compete-clause.html
Kenneth Roberts
We in the Counterjihad need to show more righteous indignation, as did Martin Luther King, Harriet Beecher Stowe and Alexander Solzhenitsyn in their various righteous struggles. We should study their examples to see what our approach should be to defeat political Islam.
The Counterjihad is, in fact, young, only about 13 years old. We have so much to learn about getting our point across effectively and to make it reality.
Why would our struggle be safe or easy? After all, it wasn’t easy for the anti-slavery abolitionist movement or for the American civil rights movement or for the democracy and freedom movement behind the iron curtain of the evil Soviet empire. Nor did it seem obvious or easy to the Abolitionists or to King’s civil rights marchers or to the Samizdat movement in the USSR as to what they should do next! One thing that is common to those three struggles is the unrelenting moral indignation that led them to victory. Righteous, moral indignation was their strongest method.
Alexander Solzhenitsyn used this method in the dying days of the Soviet Union to oppose Godless totalitarianism. For one, he never smiled for the camera for several years, because he knew smiling photos would receive wide circulation and be used against him by the Soviet authorities to suggest ‘things aren’t so bad’. Secondly, he stayed close to the problem and refused to diminish contacts with other intellectuals or leave the Soviet Union when asked to leave. Finally, having him in the Soviet Union was causing too many public relations problems. Soviet authorities forcibly expelled him from the USSR in 1974.
There are a number of BIG factors from 1968-1990 that led to Solzhenitsyn’s vindication and the ultimate collapse of the Soviet Union:
- 1960s ‘Samizdat’ (self-publishing) movement: Vladimir Bukovsky summarized it as, “I myself create it, edit it, censor it, publish it, distribute it, and get imprisoned for it.”
- 1960s Solzhenitsyn, author of best-selling books, ‘Ivan Denisovich’ and ‘Gulag Archipelago’ (Russian 1968) (English 1973)
- 1968 January Prague Spring
- 1970 Solzhenitsyn wins Nobel Prize for ‘Ivan Denisovich’
- 1973 energy crisis and birth of small-is-beautiful, opposing Soviet gigantism
- 1974 Solzhenitsyn expelled from USSR
- 1977 Václav Havel, signatory of Prague Declaration on European Conscience and Communism (launching the European Day of Remembrance for Victims of Stalinism and Nazism), dissident and famous playwright, imprisoned from May 1979 to February 1983
- 1978, Pope John Paul II, an opponent of Soviet communism, elected October 1978. In June 1979, Pope John Paul II travelled to Poland where ecstatic crowds constantly surrounded him. This first trip to Poland uplifted the nation’s spirit and sparked the formation of the Solidarity movement in 1980
- 1979 Margaret Thatcher elected, PM from 1979 to 1990
- 1980-Solidarno, anti-Soviet patriotic Polish trade union federation, formed August 1980. Pope John Paul II supports Solidarno and identifies the concept of solidarity with the poor and marginalized as a constitutive element of the Gospel and human participation in the common good
- 1980 Lech Walesa, co-founder of the Solidarity trade-union, prominent in the establishment of the 1989 Round Table Agreement that led to semi-free parliamentary elections in June 1989 and to a Solidarity-led government
- 1981 Ronald Reagan, American president 1981-1989, spokesman of freedom, enunciated righteous indignation against totalitarianism
- 1985 Mikhail Gorachev General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union from 1985 until 1991, began Glasnost (openness) in 1988-89. During an interview in 1989 Mikhail Gorbachev is quoted as saying “I detest lies”…showed internal doubt about totalitarian communism at the top
- 1991 office of General Secretary CPSU abolished
The above shows that Solzhenitsyn built on the work of Samizdat. That is where the Counterjihad Movement is now. I believe an inspiring writer will soon come on the scene to galvanize public opinion against political Islam.
My conclusion regarding the present state of the Counterjihad is that many factors are required for it to succeed, including 1) a big book (similar to ‘Uncle Tom’s Cabin’ or ‘Gulag Archipelago’) and 2) some big politicians such as Lincoln, Thatcher, John Paul II and Ronald Reagan and 3) sufficient time for the fire to incinerate political Islam.
As I pointed out, we are only 13 years old. It took 23 years from Prague Spring until the abolition of the Soviet Union, but from the death of Stalin and the beginning of the Soviet dissident movement in the 1950s and early 60s…that would be 35 years.
We are now 13 years after 9/11. We are probably only one-third of the way in the Counterjihad. We are in the Samizdat (self-publishing) phase right now. We are abandoned by powerful interests and contradicted by them. But we believe in the cause of freedom and we are not wrong. We do not yet have any great politicians (save Geert Wilders) or great novelists to inspire popular imagination, but as sure as night follows day, that will come.
Christians’ support will eventually come to the Counterjihad as it came to the issues of abolishing slavery, of civil rights and of ending the Soviet empire. Our Counterjihad is a matter of ‘charity and justice’. Politicians will eventually see too that Islam is unable to detach itself from strangling the state and human rights, so they will have to oppose it. It’s a matter of time. Time is on the side of Counterjihad because of the Internet and a plumetting Muslim birthrate. However, we should not stop our efforts, but intensify them.
A new generation is growing up imbued with the wisdom of us the Counterjihad pioneers. Very soon, they will reach maturity and they will make their presence felt on the international stage. Writers will write novels, politicians will make speeches, political parties will call for reform of immigration policies, laws, international agreements and technologies that helps Islamic supremacism and misogyny. There will be a growing awareness of the evils of jihad and Islamic hatred of the Kafir and women. It is happening now.
Our moral and righteous indignation should be stirred up intensely in this historic struggle that we in the Counterjihad Movement are bringing to fruition. Islam has no moral arguments to defend itself, so it will fall. We have valid moral arguments against Islam, so we shall overcome.
Bill Warner, Director, Center for the Study of Political Islam
Permalink: https://politicalislam.com/counterjihad-solzhenitsyn-and-righteous-indignation/
Copyright © 2014 CBSX, LLC, politicalislam.com
Use as needed, just give credit and do not edit.
www.politicalislam.com
by Kenneth Roberts, Associate Writer
There’s good reason to ask this question to ‘nice’ Muslims. It invites Muslims to declare their true values and loyalties: “When jihad comes, whose side will you be on?”
Shoppers at Westgate Mall in Nairobi and Christian students in Nigeria have recently been killed because they had the wrong religion. What will our Muslim neighbors do when the jihadists come to our neighborhood schools, churches and shopping centers in Europe and North America? Will Muslims protect non-Muslim neighbors from death or will they side with the jihadists? A shopping mall jihad has already occurred in the U.S., but it was largely ignored.
You mean, it’s already happened in America?
Yes, an event similar to the Westgate Mall attack occurred on the evening of Feb. 12, 2007. A young Muslim man walked into the Trolley Square Mall in Salt Lake City with a pistol-grip, 12-gauge shotgun and a 38-caliber revolver and opened fire on shoppers, killing five and wounding four others, including a pregnant woman. The death toll at Trolley Square was higher than in the Boston Marathon Bombing, but the killings were misattributed to insanity, rather than jihad.
Will jihadists attack shopping centers across America? Undoubtedly! They will do so because it is the Sunna, the perfect example of Mohammed. In 627 AD, Mohammed beheaded 800 unarmed male civilians in Medina in a single day. He did so in a market.
Islam’s Dual Allegiance
Muslims have two loyalties: religious and political. Americans are loyal only to the constitution. America has no state religion to adhere to. But Islam has both. True Muslims must be loyal to the political act of jihad as well as to the religion of Islam. Islam is a religion as well as a military organization. This is not an opinion, but the decree of Mohammed:
“My brother and I came to the Prophet and I requested him to take the pledge of allegiance from us for migration. He said, “Migration has passed away with its people.” I asked, “For what will you take the pledge of allegiance from us then?” He (Mohammed) said, “I will take (the pledge) for Islam and JIHAD.” – (Bukhari 4,52,208)
Mohammed says allegiance to Islam includes the political act of jihad. Jihad is holy fighting against the Kafirs; it is the personal duty of every Muslim. If a Muslim does not participate in jihad, he will die a ‘hypocrite’ and burn in hell. Mohammed is the authority on Islam.
Why don’t Muslims denounce the terrorists?
Islam is harsh on ‘hypocrites’ (munafiqoon in Arabic). Munafiqs are ‘moderate Muslims’. They give only lip service to Islam. Mohammed wanted to burn the munafiqs to death in their homes for not participating in prayers or jihad.
Nonetheless, participate or not, they must not hinder jihad by thought, word or deed. Islam’s ‘munafiqs’ sit back and look the other way, while jihadists fight the Kafirs and subdue them. When a munafiq helps Kafirs during jihad, he becomes a traitor to Islam; he is considered to be a Kafir at war with Islam, so jihadists may kill him too.
When jihad comes, a munafiq is not neutral. He is on the side of jihad, rather than on the side of Kafirs. A munafiq is silent when the jihadists knock on their non-Muslim neighbor’s door. The reason for this silence is in the Koran (28.86) ‘never be a supporter of the disbelievers’.
Munafiqs can be reactivated in jihad
One of the surprising things about Islam is how non-practicing Muslims often return to active service in jihad. Sometimes it only takes a personal contact or a rousing sermon to turn a non-practicing, ‘moderate’ Muslim into a jihadist. This is similar to the recruitment of young pacifists in time of war. The Tsarnaev brothers were nice, ‘moderate’ Muslims and then they became religious jihadists.
Boston Munafiqs
How did ‘munafiqs’ behave during the Boston Marathon Bombings? When Djokhar Tsarnaev was about to be arrested, he called his non-practicing, ‘secular’ Muslim friends to dispose of incriminating evidence in his dorm room. They eagerly complied. When members of the Tsarnaevs’ mosque were asked about the two brothers, they kept silent about what they knew. When recruited, the munafiqs acted on the side of jihad.
Munafiqs at Westgate Mall, Nairobi
When jihad came to Westgate Mall in Nairobi, there were many munafiqs shopping that day. Did those munafiqs try to convince the jihadists that Islam is a ‘religion of peace’ and to stop the executions and tortures? No, they left hurriedly and let the jihadists do their work of executing unarmed Kafirs in a market. The Westgate jihadists believed they were following Sunna.
The Westgate Mall munafiqs were not neutral. They took the side of jihad by doing nothing to stop it. Their silence gave approval to jihadic terrorism.
Salman Rushdie Fatwa
When a fatwa was declared against writer Salman Rushdie, ordinary British Muslims expressed strong support for blasphemy laws to punish critics of Islam.
The musician known as Cat Stevens was asked if he would go to a demonstration to burn an effigy of the author Salman Rushdie. ”I would have hoped that it’d be the real thing,” he replied.
Furthermore, if Mr. Rushdie turned up at his doorstep looking for help, ”I might ring somebody who might do more damage to him than he would like…I’d try to phone the Ayatollah Khomeini and tell him exactly where this man is.” In his own words, Cat Stevens, aka Yusuf Islam, would take the side of jihad if the opportunity came. ‘Moderate’ Muslims like Yusuf Islam know which side they are on. Not on the side of the Kafir, because jihad is not a ‘peace train’.
Jihad at Broken Hill, Australia, 1915
In 1915, two Kurdish immigrants to Australia read the Sultan’s pamphlet announcing a universal jihad and planned their own self-directed jihad. They waited beside railway tracks and randomly shot Australian civilians on a train on its way to a picnic. Fatalities occurred. They then shot a police constable. It’s similar to the Boston Marathon bombings, when you think about it.
What has changed in 100 years? The doctrine is the same. The weapons are more sophisticated.
Munafiqs of the Armenian Genocide
Edwin Pears recorded this account from a Muslim woman in Turkey:
“Then one night, my husband came home and told me that the padisha (caliph) had sent word that we were to kill all the Christians in our village, and that we would have to kill our (Christian) neighbours. I was very angry, and told him that I did not care who gave such orders; they were wrong. These neighbours had always been kind to us, and if he dared to kill them Allah would pay us out. I tried all I could to stop him, but he killed them — killed them with his own hand.” (Sir Edwin Pears, Turkey and Its People, London: Methuen and Co., 1911, p. 39)
When jihad against Christian subjects of Turkey was declared in 1915, ordinary Muslim village men were led to Friday prayers. Someone read out the Sultan’s summons to jihad and the villagers proceeded to participate in the genocide of Armenians, Assyrian Orthodox and Greek Anatolians, the indigenous peoples of Turkey. Ordinary ‘moderate’ Muslims responded to the call of jihad. Three million people disappeared from the populace within ten years.
Notable Exceptions
There are some noteworthy examples of Muslims who saved lives during jihad. Khaled Abdewahhab of Tunisia was the first Arab to receive a ‘Righteous Gentile’ award from Israel. He had hidden a Jewish family at his country home until liberation came. In 1915, a Turkish doctor ‘married’ four of his Armenian patients to save them from extermination. The uncle of the Tsarnaev brothers denounced his nephews and ordered them to surrender.
So what motivates Muslims when they help Kafirs in trouble? The answer is these ‘moderate’ Muslims are disregarding the Koran (28.86) ‘never be a supporter of the disbelievers’.
We Western people need to reexamine our political correctness. We need to learn the dualistic doctrine of the Kafir that underpins jihad. Otherwise, we will continue to have attacks against Kafir civilians like those at the Westgate Mall, Trolley Square Mall and the Boston Marathon. Muslims who attack civilians are imitating what Mohammed did in Medina in 627 AD.
One of the ways to learn about Islam’s dualism is to ask a Muslim: ‘When jihad comes to our neighborhood, whose side will you be on?’
Bill Warner, Director, Center for the Study of Political Islam
Permalink: https://politicalislam.com/when-the-jihad-comes-whose-side-will-you-be-on/
Copyright © 2013 CBSX, LLC, politicalislam.com
Use as needed, just give credit and do not edit.
www.politicalislam.com
by Kenneth Roberts
Why do some American journalists have trouble discerning the motives behind the Boston bombings? The Tsarnaev brothers killed Bostonians for the honor of Islam. Westerners do not understand the Islamic concept of honor. ‘Honor’ to a Muslim is something as concrete and tangible as the Washington Monument, the Colorado River or the Rocky Mountains.
Honor as Plunder
To a Muslim, ‘honor’ is as real as money in the bank or gold coins hidden in a box in the drawer. Honor brings prestige to Islam, to Mohammed and to Allah. Because ‘honor’ is so important in Islam, the main goal of jihad is to acquire more ‘honor’ for Islam. How this acquisition is done is simple. It is done through by humiliating kafirs. For Muslims, honor is real and concrete, and not merely an abstract concept.
Honor always flows towards Islam. Kafirs should not have ‘honor’ because it keeps them from becoming Muslims.
If a man has honor and he is a kafir, Muslims must conduct jihad to take away some or all of his ‘honor’. When this happens, Muslim ‘honor’ increases just like money increasing in a bank account or like the heavier side of balances that drops down when it outweighs the lighter side. Plundering the honor of kafirs encourages them to convert to Islam. Every Muslim understands this concept and accepts it as normal, natural and good. Allah said so in his pre-existent Koran. That settles it.
Islamic ‘honor’ resembles the reputation of sports teams. If the Boston Bruins have won 4 games against the Montreal Canadiens while losing 5 games to them, the Bruins must win the next match to recover their honor by disgracing the Canadiens.
Muslims count Islamic honor in terms of shaming the kafirs. When Boston’s kafirs require 1,000 police officers to find and arrest a 19-year-old Muslim jihadist, it is a thousand points for Islam. When two Muslims outwit kafirs and plant bombs that kill women and children at a sporting event, it is great victory for Islam, because the kafirs with all their resources were outsmarted by only two Muslims. In addition, all Muslims are aware that when Muslims suffer anywhere in the world, kafirs must undergo retaliation to bring back honor to Islam.
Shame
The Tsarnaevs knew that Allah commands Muslims to steal the honor of kafirs. Shaming the kafirs means defeating them in jihad:
Koran 9:14 – “Fight them. May God punish them by your hands, humiliate them, give you victory over them, and delight the hearts of the believers.” (Muhammad Sarwar version)
The Tsarnaev brothers brought pride to all true Muslims by their victory. Tamerlan (named after the genocidal murderer of 20 million kafirs) is now an Islamic martyr. Tamerlan died after shooting a policemen several times in the neck and while throwing home-made grenades at police. He humiliated American police, and then became a martyr. Islamic martyrdom is the greatest honor in Islam. Martyrs prove Islam is true by giving their lives. Islamic martyrs score the greatest number of points for Islam.
Scoring Points
It’s like a sports match. Muslims notch up points on the honor scoreboard when kafirs bleed. The shame of Muslims is washed away by blood flowing from the bodies of American kafirs. The successful assassination of Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda commanders must be avenged. Allah approves of such revenge in his eternally valid words. Retaliation is a non-optional Divine Command for Muslims. There are thousands of possible humiliations of Muslims by America to justify revenge against the kafirs. The first and foremost reason is that kafirs do not recognize that Mohammed is a prophet and even mock and distract from his honor by calling him names like genocide, warlord, plagiarist or pedophile. These disgraceful blasphemies against Allah’s perfect role model demand blood vengeance. Even worse, kafirs blaspheme Islam by sending their national armies to fight Allah’s legitimate warriors in Islamic countries, thereby requiring all Muslim males to fight them until they are forced to submit to Islam and pay Allah’s head tax.
Koran 9.29 “Fight those who … acknowledge not the religion of Truth (Islam) from the People of the Book, until they pay the jizya tax with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.”
Mohammed emphasized that unsubmitting kafirs should be humiliated:
Bukhari 61.2756 “My provision has been placed under the shadow of my spear, and abasement and humility have been placed on the one who disobeys my command.”
Kafirs should be forced to submit to Islam through violence and then humiliated. The Tsarnaev brothers were motivated by such thoughts.
Americans have not yet submitted to Islam; they fight against jihad in Muslim countries; innocent non-combatants are often killed accidently while Americans pursue the Taliban and Al Qaeda. Therefore, Americans deserve retaliation just as the Montreal Canadiens should be beaten by the Boston Bruins. It’s as obvious as that to a Muslim. Humiliating America increases the honor of Islam.
Allah and Sharia approve Retaliation
When Muslims are slain ‘without right’, retaliation is obligatory. This can take the form of jihad when kafirs are targeted and self-directed jihad is allowed in the absence of a global caliphate.
Koran 2:178 – “O you who believe, retaliation is prescribed for you regarding the slain…”
(Sharia law text) Reliance of the Traveller o1.1 – “Retaliation is obligatory (A: if the person entitled wishes to take it against anyone who kills a human being purely intentionally and without right.)”
No kafir ever has a right to kill a Muslim, but it is not a sin in Sharia to kill a kafir; it is at most a misdemeanor for which a fine is sufficient:
Reliance of the Traveller o1.2 – “The following are not subject to retaliation: …a Muslim for killing a non-Muslim”
When Muslims die due to kafirs, kafirs may be selected for death to balance the honor of Islam, but the reverse does not apply. Honor must only flow in the direction of Islam. All Muslims understand this.
Washing Away Shame
Islamic retaliatory violence restores the honor of the family, clan or tribe. This is sanctioned by the
Koran 11.173 – “Believers, retaliation is decreed for you in bloodshed.”
This is well expressed by Abu Tammam, a ninth-century poet. “With the sword will I wash my shame away. Let God’s doom bring on me what it may!”
The Tsarnaev brothers knew all this instinctively and were willing to wash away the shame of global Islam by slaying American spectators and police at a sports event.
Al Qaeda has been unable to carry off a major terrorist action in America since 9-11. Islam’s honor is in a severe deficit. Al Qaeda needed to find American Muslim youth to carry out martyrdom operations to retaliate against America’s many successful military operations in the Near East and elsewhere.
Around the world, Muslims believe that the generous-hearted Americans will retaliate against Muslims in general, but this is merely attributing to Americans the Islamic motives of the Tsarnaev brothers.
The Boston Bombings are retaliatory killings in the name of honor in the tradition of Mohammed.
Bill Warner, Director, Center for the Study of Political Islam
Permalink: https://politicalislam.com/the-boston-honor-bombings/
Copyright © 2013 CBSX, LLC, politicalislam.com
Use as needed, just give credit and do not edit.
www.politicalislam.com
‘The Jihad against Women’
Part 1 here
Kenneth Roberts, Associate Writer
Jihad-and-hegira (attack-and-retreat) is the third ‘essential doctrine’ (usul ud-deen) in Islam. This push-pull dynamic, applied against women, produces Islam’s Stockholm syndrome, forcing women to submit to men. Compliant women in turn create compliant families in a compliant, monocultural Muslim society.
Muslims instinctively recognize jihad-and-hegira, a dualistic pattern that allows Muslims in stages to be both militant, then conciliatory. Jihad and hegira are opposite ends of one swing or, if you will, two phases of one cycle. Militant jihad prepares the way for conciliatory ‘peaceful Islam’. ‘Peaceful Islam’ then sets up jihad/holy warfare. In this manner, Islam ratchets itself forward, just as a reaper advances into a field, cutting wheat with the forward-and-back, swinging motion of a scythe.
Dualistic Jihad-and-Hegira creates Stockholm Syndrome
Muslims instinctively expect jihadic violence to set up the conditions for conversion to ‘peaceful Islam’ (and so it does), but the ‘miracle’ they perceive is actually the Stockholm syndrome. An example from the Sira illustrates this point:
“Mas’ud leapt upon Sunayna, one of the Jewish merchants with whom his family had social and commercial relations and killed him. The Muslim’s brother complained, saying, ‘Why did you kill him? You have much fat in you belly from his charity.’ Mas’ud answered, ‘By Allah, had Muhammad ordered me to murder you, my brother, I would have cut off your head.’ Whereupon the brother said, ‘Any religion that can bring you to this is indeed wonderful!’ And he accepted Islam.” (Ishaq: 369)
This counterintuitive story from the Sira illustrates how terrorism and the startling threat of fratricide lead to Islamic conversion. After the carnage of 9-11, Muslims around the world claimed without evidence that there was an increase in conversions to Islam. Muslims sincerely believed the viciousness of 9-11 had led to a miraculous admiration for Islam, rather than revulsion. This is a telltale sign that Muslims unconsciously recognize the Stockholm syndrome.
However, victims of the Stockholm syndrome are unaware they have been programmed to endorse violence. Muslims themselves, and their victims, become dissociated through the ratcheting motion of jihad-and-hegira.
Kafirs need to recognize that militant jihadists (what politicians call ‘Muslim extremists’) and ‘nice Muslims’ (i.e. ‘moderate Muslims’) are simply opposite ends of Islam’s bipolarity…jihad-and-hegira…rather two different kinds of Muslim. Muslims shift easily between the two poles.
From Submissives to Co-perpetrators
Jihad-and-hegira is classic Islamic dualism. Dualism explains most of Islam. In dualism, there are unequal pairs in which one side must submit to the other. In the Stockholm syndrome, there is a dominator and a submissive. In Islam, women always submit to a man. Under the permanent threat of execution sanctioned by Allah in the Koran and sacred Sharia law, Islam’s unwilling female victims are transformed into willing codependents and active co-perpetrators with the jihadists.
Gendercide embedded in Sharia Law
Islamic male supremacism is embedded in the eternally valid words of Mohammed. He said that women are mentally and spiritually inferior to men, that they may be controlled by their husbands by beating them and by isolating them. Muslim husbands even have the right to honor kill their wives under Koran 4.34: “Then if they obey you, take no further action against them.”
The choice of ‘further action’ is up to the male owner of the chattels. Daughters and granddaughters may be honor killed under Koran 18.81 and Sharia law (ref. o1.1-4, ‘The Reliance of the Traveller’). In many Islamic countries, honor killings are not punished with severity, if they are punished at all. Mullahs living in Western countries sometimes claim that honor killing is ‘un-Islamic’; however, here it is clearly allowed in Sharia law. What is left unsaid in Sharia’s murder loophole is more important than what is said, because murder is morally reprehensible and the mullahs need plausible deniability.
Muslim women realize honor killing is a valid part of Islam, since it is eternally approved by Allah/Mohammed and by Sharia. Muslim women also accept that they have half the value of a man and that their entire body is a shameful sexual organ (‘awra’) that must be concealed by veils. They accept that the male head of the family is authorized under Sharia to be judge, jury and executioner within his family in the matter of honor killings. Muslim women are sociologically isolated through cousin marriage, so they accept there is nothing they can do about their lot but submit. Even so, thousands of Muslim women commit suicide every year in order to escape from Islam.
In Islam, women are ‘prisoners’ and ‘domestic animals’ of men. Noncompliant women may thus be culled in the same way a farmer culls rogue animals that exhibit behavioral problems.
Muslim males (and their female co-perpetrators) perceive honor killings as restoring family honor by removing an embarrassing behavioral problem.
Psychological Effect on Muslim Women
While jihadic violence is the initiating cause, the Stockholm syndrome is the psychological effect on Muslim women. Briefly put, jihad’s permanent, Allah-given threat of violence against women produces the astonishing psychological effect of cooperative victims.
One simple definition of jihad is the subjugation of women and ‘others’ using Mohammed’s methods. Mohammed’s methods implant the Stockholm syndrome in women.
Ideal female cooperation with the Muslim perpetrator is illustrated in Mohammed’s official biography, The Sira:
“When the apostle arrived at the home of his family he gave his sword to his daughter Fatima, saying, ‘Wash the blood from it, little one. By Allah, it has been true to me today.’ Ali, too, gave her his sword and said, ‘Take this and wash the blood from it. By Allah, it has been true to me today’. The name of the apostle’s sword was Dhul-Faqar (spine-splitter).” (Ishaq, Chap.14, Uhud)
Mohammed’s daughter Fatima is the perfect example of the Stockholm syndrome: she prepares the weapons of jihad which will in turn subjugate and enslave more women, herself included. She is a co-dependent.
Psychologically, the Stockholm syndrome is a Muslim woman’s attempt to escape from the despair of lifelong incarceration in Islam. Muslim women may be beaten, locked up and even honor-killed. Muslim women accept this abusive relationship because Allah eternally commands it in the Koran, as well as Mohammed in his final sermon. Muslim women give consent to men keeping them as ‘prisoners’ and ‘domestic animals’.
Mohammed’s chauvinistic final commands contained in his final sermon may never be abrogated, so Muslim women cannot be liberated until the end of time.
With 600 million female captives, Islam is a case of the Stockholm syndrome on an industrial scale. Muslim women cooperate in their own captivity because it is Allah’s will that they do so, even to the point of participating in the honor killing of other female relatives or their own children.
Co-perpetrators in Honor Killing
Victims of the Stockholm syndrome accept the violent ideology of their captors. They accept that the captors have the right to take hostages and even murder them in the name of their cause. As the Stockholm syndrome deepens, hostages finally become true believers and even co-conspirators as was observed in the famous case of Patty Hearst.
In Islam, all women are permanent hostages who may be honor killed by their male guardians at any moment. The justification for honor killing comes from Allah’s eternally valid words commanding the murder of apostates who leave Islam (K.18.81).
A Muslim, who refuses to be compliant to Islamic theocracy, becomes a guilty non-Muslim kafir, one who ‘hides’ the fact that Mohammed is right.
Islam’s non-compliant women have become kafirs and traitors to Islam who must be executed. Under the draconian rules of Sharia law, no blood compensation is paid to a family in the killing of an apostate from Islam nor is there any Sharia punishment for the killer (Reliance of the Traveller, o8.4). This means that murdering an apostate is normative Islam. This permanent death threat to all Muslims who rebel —and especially to all women—is the key component of Islam’s Stockholm syndrome.
A Muslim woman has three options: 1) embrace the Stockholm syndrome, 2) wait to be honor-killed or 3) flee Islam (suicide is one way of fleeing Islam).
Tragically, many victims of Islamic honor-killings have first been lulled into a sense of false security by their captors before being betrayed and honor-killed by them. Giving false assurances to victims and luring them into a trap is the sacred example of Mohammed in the Hadiths and Sira.
As lifelong prisoners of men, Muslim women are Islam’s first victims. After succumbing to the Stockholm syndrome, Muslim women endorse Mohammed’s brutal methods. The more they dissociate and identify with Mohammed, the more women act as co-dependents and co-perpetrators.
In spite of thousands of Islamic honor killings each year, Western Feminists have shown little interest in addressing Islam’s industrial-scale misogyny. Western Feminists have instead become pacified dhimmis, unconsciously embracing Islam’s Stockholm syndrome and abetting the perpetrators, rather than live under the constant anxiety of jihad. By their silence, Western Feminists have given up the fight against male supremacism and submitted to Islam.
A Successful Program of Intimidation
The stability of Islam depends on its complete control of women.
The permanent threat of death for non-compliance is the key to understanding Islam’s great psychological control over women and dhimmis. This ‘living under the avalanche’ creates the Stockholm syndrome which gives Islam its enduring stability and power.
The Stockholm syndrome is arguably Mohammed’s greatest discovery and the key to Islam’s success. Mohammed and his followers thought the Stockholm syndrome was a true miracle! But it is no miracle.
Fear transforms Islamic society through the unending threat of violence and death. The Stockholm syndrome is the psychological heart of Islam.
Bill Warner, Director, Center for the Study of Political Islam
Permalink: https://politicalislam.com/women-islam-and-the-stockholm-syndrome-part-2/
Copyright © 2013 CBSX, LLC, politicalislam.com
Use as needed, just give credit and do not edit.
www.politicalislam.com
Kenneth Roberts, Associate Writer
What causes a Muslim woman to honor-kill the children she has borne and raised? The explanation is ‘the Stockholm Syndrome’. It is one of the secret keys of political Islam and Mohammed’s greatest discovery.
The Stockholm syndrome or ‘capture bonding’ is a psychological paradox in which hostages develop empathy and positive feelings towards their captors, even to the point of adopting the captor’s oppressive ideology. One would expect captives to experience resentment and hatred towards an abuser, but that is not what occurs in the Stockholm syndrome.
Rather, the Stockholm syndrome takes hold in a few days as a result of captors performing small acts of kindness towards their doomed captives. The threat of certain death in contrast with kind gestures is thought to bring about the syndrome. The confused captive soon begins to identify with the cruel psyche of the captor in order to survive.
This push-pull dynamic of terror alternating with moments of relative benevolence produces this delusion in the mind of the captive. The captive then begins to believe the far-fetched justifications for brutality and murder that bend the minds of her or his terrorist captors.
The Stockholm syndrome is a severe form of a psychological phenomenon known as dissociation. It is the mind’s survival mechanism, the way trauma victims convince themselves that “this isn’t happening”. Mohammed discovered it by accident.
Why ‘Greatest Discovery’
The discovery of the Stockholm syndrome changed Mohammed’s life. Before discovering the Stockholm syndrome, Mohammed preached religion for 13 years and collected about 150 followers. After his discovery of capture bonding, Mohammed’s political movement grew exponentially.
How did Mohammed’s great discovery occur? It began with a problem.
Omar’s Revelations
After leaving Mecca, Mohammed’s small, impoverished movement began to pick up ruffians to assist in pillaging the Meccans. Mohammed had previously been living in a polite, middle class, business environment. He and his followers were not used to the rough, rude manners of the pillaging ‘Ansaris’ (auxiliaries) that Mohammed had hired in exchange for a share of booty on his vengeful raids against the Meccans. Even the manners of Ansari women were rough and insubordinate. The women of Mohammed’s group began to pick up the highly assertive manners of the Ansari women. At first, Mohammed took no notice, but Omar bin Khattab did. Omar pushed Mohammed to receive a revelation from Allah.
Allah soon sent Mohammed an eternal revelation that men should beat their wives into submission. Were these original Muslim women beaten ‘lightly’ as recommended by modern mullahs? Apparently not. Aisha (Mohammed’s preteen bride) later said, “I have not seen any woman suffering as much as the believing women.” (Bukhari 7:72:715)
Veiling and Isolation: Ingredients of Stockholm Syndrome
Veiling is another important contributor to the Islamic Stockholm syndrome. Veiling causes isolation from perspectives other than those of the captor.
Veiling came about when Omar yet again provoked a crisis, this time by following Muslim women to the privies. Omar noted that free Muslim women, if left unveiled, could not be distinguished from unveiled slaves. Since Mohammed permitted his men to ‘molest’ slaves, Omar demanded action “…as he desired eagerly that the verses of al-hijab may be revealed. So Allah revealed the verses of “al-Hijab” (Sahih Bukhari 1.14.148). Allah swiftly gave an eternal command about veiling, so that married women (including Omar’s wives) could no longer be ‘misidentified’ as kafirs and ‘molested’ by jihadists (Koran 33.59). According to Allah, unveiled women don’t get protection from rape.
Mohammed’s Prisoners
By limiting women’s independence of movement and making them indistinguishable one from another, veiling produces permanent isolation of women, a necessary condition for the Stockholm syndrome. The combination of isolation, beating and the veil turn Muslim women into passive, isolated, malleable non-persons. Muslim women live in a permanent state of dissociation and denial.
Because of Omar, the freedom of Muslim women has not increased at all in the last 1400 years, while everywhere else women’s rights have steadily evolved. Muslim women are still restricted to a form of house arrest as ‘domestic animals’ or ‘prisoners’, forced to interact only with their husbands and children (read ‘Mohammed’s Final Sermon’).
Choosing Compliance as an Alternative to Death
As the Stockholm syndrome takes hold, victims perceive they can either resist the perpetrator and meet certain death or they can comply and hope to live. The threat of certain death is a necessary factor in the Stockholm syndrome. Islam provides this permanent threat to women through the eternally existing Koran, Mohammed’s Sunna (perfect example) and sacred Sharia law.
No Islamic doctrine depends on a single verse, but on the Koran, Mohammed’s example and the canonical decisions of Islamic jurists. They create a three-dimensional picture of conduct that all Muslims must follow. Tragically, Islamic law provides broad loopholes for the honor killing of women.
The Koran says that if a Muslim woman obeys her male owner after a beating, no further action should be taken. The words ‘take no further action’ (Koran 4.34) are highly significant, since they imply that actions beyond beating may be taken, perhaps mutilation, perhaps starvation or death through honor killing. The choice of ‘further action’ is up to the male owner of the chattels. Modern mullahs often try to tone this down for Western audiences, but such moderation is not in foundational Islam. Koran 4.15 & 34 offer the basis for honor killing of women, since a husband needn’t feed a woman if her performance is unsatisfactory. She may be locked up and starved in her home.
Mohammed’s sacred example approves of a blind man who murders the mother of his children because she blasphemed Mohammed.
Sharia law also makes ample room for honor killing of women by omitting any punishment for the murderer of an apostate or the murderer of disobedient children or grandchildren. In the context of cousin marriage, Sharia leaves the door open to the honor killing of women with the blessing of the couple’s common grandparents (Reliance of the Traveller, o1.2, 1-5). Such honor killing is perfectly legal under Sharia, there being no punishment for it.
Honor killing is eternally permitted (though not commanded) in Islam. Such violence against women is part of jihad, the ‘struggle’ to force women and ‘others’ to submit without resistance to Muslim males.
Dhimmitude: a Captivity Contract
Dhimmis capitulate to Islamic rule. Captive Muslim women (as well as entire captive nations) are given the stark choice of being beaten (or dead) prisoners…or living, compliant semi-slaves to Islam. Since it is difficult to endure the despair of permanent captivity, Islam’s captives dissociate and ‘voluntarily’ choose compliance. This condition of surrender to Islam is called ‘dhimmitude’. When entire kafir nations submit to Islamic supremacism, they become pacified kafirs or ‘dhimmis’ under a humiliating ‘dhimma’ (protection) agreement. Nevertheless, if dhimmis resist their Muslim overlords even a little, they are deemed to have broken their contract of ‘protection’ and they revert to being unprotected ‘kafirs’ or ‘harbis’ who must be ‘fought’.
Sharia’s logic is that a Muslim woman who resists her owner has become an apostate from Islam, a ‘kafir’ or even a ‘harbi’ who may lawfully be murdered, since she has abandoned the rules of Islam. Under Sharia, no blood indemnity is required in the murder of an apostate, so killing defiant women is permitted. This is easily done with the consent of the parents or grandparents in a cousin marriage.
A majority of Muslim women actually marry a first cousin, so family-directed violence against women is rife in Islam. Cousin marriage places a secure sociological noose around the majority of Muslim women. Thanks to Sharia law and cousin marriage, Muslim women are Mohammed’s prisoners having no escape from violence and death.
Bill Warner, Director, Center for the Study of Political Islam
Permalink: https://politicalislam.com/mohammeds-greatest-discovery-part-1/
Copyright © 2013 CBSX, LLC, politicalislam.com
Use as needed, just give credit and do not edit.
www.politicalislam.com
Is Islam tolerant of Christianity? Muslims say yes, but what are the facts?
Mullahs around the world warn Muslims not to respond to the words ‘Merry Christmas’. If Jesus is the ‘prince of peace’, it makes Mohammed look bad. In the last years of his life, Mohammed led and commanded violent aggression every six weeks. Mohammed was the ‘prince of jihad’.
Muslims believe angels announced the birth of Jesus, but Muslims do not believe the Gospel where the angels said, “Peace on earth.” Peace with Kafirs is not possible. The Christmas greeting to Christians around the world is still the same as it was in 630 AD: “Aslim, Taslam!” (Surrender to Islam and be safe). Where Christians do not surrender to Islamic terrorists, their lives are now in danger.
For the Muslim, the world cannot be at peace until every government on earth follows the laws of Allah. The duty of Muslims is to create the conditions that drive non-Muslims into the arms of Sharia law, ‘whether by persuasion or by force’ as ibn Khaldun wrote.
If Christians won’t voluntarily change their laws to Shari’a, then it is the duty of every Muslim to induce Christians in three ways: violence, extortion or enslavement.
Muslims around the world are particularly aware of Christianity at Christmas time when they become even more determined to impose Sharia. This leads to jihad attacks in churches in Egypt, Pakistan, Nigeria and Indonesia. Attacking worshipping Christians is jihad. The purpose is to discourage them from their non-Islamic worship. In Nigerian churches, most women have been asked not to bring a purse and armed guards stand at the door with metal detectors to screen every worshipper. This is because jihadists are taught in the hadiths to lull enemies of Allah into trust before betraying them. Every person entering a church might be a jihadist.
The purpose of jihad is to implement discriminatory Sharia. Sharia is not benign to Christians.
The purpose of Sharia is to destroy Christian and other cultures and replace them with theocratic totalitarianism. Jihad is the method for imposing Sharia. Jihad is aggressive: it can take the form of deception or disinformation, robbery, lawsuits or it can be violent with the destruction of property or assassination of church leaders. All jihad is good because it is Mohammed’s sacred method.
Since 1990 in Nigeria, some 1000 Christians have been murdered by jihadists every year. Probably, the number is much higher with many jihad-motivated murders being put down as ordinary homicides or accidental manslaughters. Most of the jihad murders take place in northern Nigeria where Islamist want to impose Sharia law.
Nigeria has one of the highest scholarship rates in Africa. As Nigerians gain graduate and post-graduate degrees, they often leave Islam and switch to Christianity which they identified with Western progress. Islamists see going to university as the problem. Better to stay at home, memorize the Koran and remain loyal to Mohammed, the perfect man, than to learn to improve society, build infrastructure, services, health sciences or engineering in the country.
Boko Haram (meaning ‘Western education is taboo’) is the main Islamic terror group fighting the rapid Christianization of Nigeria. They are now allied with Al Qaeda. Their trademark is to attack congregation while they are worshipping or throw bombs into restaurants where Christians eat after services. This is ethnic cleansing and genocide. Mohammed ethnically cleansed the Jewish tribes in Arabia, so it is normative Islam. Boko Haram wants to ethnically cleanse Christians from northern Nigeria. Mohammed’s ethnic cleansing method goes like this: intimidate, humiliate and expropriate until you can annihilate.
Most of the countries that are now Islamic were once Christian. The Christian presence in Turkey is almost nil, and in most of North Africa it is tiny, but it was once close to 100% in all of them. What changed things was Sharia law. Under discriminatory Sharia law, Christians must live in an inferior social status to Muslims, they must wear clothing that humiliates them, they must never ride on a horse, they must pay a punitive tax, they must never speak about Islam or the Koran, they must never ring their church’s bell, they must never have an outdoor religious ceremony or speak to a Muslim about Christianity, they must move aside when a Muslim walks down the street. As well, no new churches may be built and old ones may never be repaired unless hefty bribes are given to the authorities. The policy of Sharia is to systemically make life difficult for Christians to practice their faith, all the while encouraging them to convert.
Then there is the ‘love jihad’. Mohammed started this with the comment ‘marry one woman (out of four wives) for the religion’. Muslim men have taken this as a commandment to abduct a Christian girl, confine her and then declare her to be married without her consent. The girl’s family is then told she has converted to Islam and they may never see her. Police do nothing, because it’s Sharia and Sharia trumps any man-made law. No one can estimate how many Christian girls have been abducted and sequestered in the ‘love jihad’, but the fact that many African Christians tattoo a cross on the forehead and cheeks of their girls speaks volumes.
The reason Christians were not substantially cleansed from Islamic countries until the Turkish genocides of 1915-1924 is because Christians were used for a supply of jizzya [dhimmi tax] and they were very useful in medicine, the arts, building and garbage removal. Turkey ethnically cleansed three million Armenian, Assyrian and Greek Christians to confiscate their wealth and properties for a government at war that was strapped for ready cash. The Young Turks were also jihadists hoping to make Turkey the capital of a global caliphate promoting Sharia law. Discriminatory Sharia law is like a ratchet that only tightens a bolt even though it apparently moves back and forwards. Sharia only benefits Islam.
So when Americans hear the church bells ring on Christmas Eve, remember that Christians worshipping in Islamic regions like northern Nigeria may hear the sound of bombs thrown in the church door, guns shooting down the main aisle or the sound of fire on the church roof.
Merry Christmas.
Written by Kenneth Roberts
Bill Warner, Director, Center for the Study of Political Islam
Permalink: https://politicalislam.com/un-merry-christmas-to-christians-from-islam/
Copyright © 2012 CBSX, LLC, politicalislam.com
Use as needed, just give credit and do not edit.
www.politicalislam.com
Mohammed’s Litmus Test (…of Original Islam)
by Kenneth Roberts
What is the original Islam?
Muslim apologists claim that original Islam meant ‘peace’, but what is the evidence? Mohammed claimed the opposite.
According to Mohammed, original Islam is jihad.
Narrated Abdullah ibn Umar:
I heard the Apostle of Allah say: When you enter into the inah transaction (become businessmen), hold the tails of oxen (become cattlemen), are pleased with agriculture (become farmers), and give up conducting jihad, Allah will make disgrace prevail over you, and will not withdraw it until you return to your original religion. – Sunan Abu Dawud Book 23, Number 3455
Conducting jihad is the ‘original religion’ of Mohammed. Mohammed is the authority on Islam.
Mohammed’s Litmus Test
Just as adherence to the U.S. constitution is the litmus test of American identity, so adherence to jihad is Mohammed’s test of loyalty to Islam.
Mohammed’s litmus test is the willingness of Muslims to conduct jihad. That is how Mohammed determined who is a genuine Muslim and who is a lukewarm ‘hypocrite’.
Lukewarm Muslims do not go on jihad. Lukewarm Muslims go into trades or farming. By this test, most Muslims today are condemned. Non-jihadist Muslims have abandoned original Islam.
Lest this be considered too hasty, let’s examine further evidence.
Narrated Mujashi: My brother and I came to the Prophet and I requested him to take the pledge of allegiance from us for migration. He said, “Migration has passed away with its people.” I asked, “For what will you take the pledge of allegiance from us then?” He (Mohammed) said, “I will take (the pledge) for Islam and jihad.” – Bukhari 4,52,208
In the above quote, Mohammed says that allegiance to Islam includes a commitment to the political action of jihad.
In addition, the Koran says lukewarm Muslims can be recognized because they avoid jihad.
“It is only those who believe not in Allah and the Last Day and whose hearts are in doubt that ask your leave (to be exempted from jihad).” – K. 9.45
“But when a decisive surah (explaining and ordering things) is sent down, and fighting (holy fighting in Allah’s Cause) is mentioned (i.e. ordained) therein, you will see those in whose hearts is a disease (of hypocrisy) looking at you with a look of one fainting to death…” – K. 47:20
So not going on jihad is a disease or mental illness in Muslims according to Allah/Mohammed.
Non-Jihadists are ‘Rubbish’
Not content with calling non-jihadists ‘diseased’, Mohammed insults them further; they are ‘garbage’:
“Prophet Muhammad said; It is expected that the nations will call other nations to share them against you (Muslims) as the eaters call each other to eat from the food in front of them in a large wooden plate A person asked, Will that happen because of our small number on that day? The Prophet said, No. Your number will be great, but you will be rubbish like the rubbish of flood-water. And certainly Allah will remove from the hearts of enemies the fear of you and surely Allah will throw Wahn in your hearts. A person asked, What is Wahn, O Messenger of Allah? The Prophet said, Wahn is to love this world and to hate death.” – Abu Dawud 4284
The Messenger of God said: The nations are about to flock against you [the Muslims] from every horizon, just as hungry people flock to a kettle. We said: O Messenger of God, will we be few on that day? He said: No, you will be many in number, but you will be scum, like the scum of a flash-flood, without any weight, since fear will be removed from the hearts of your enemies, and weakness (wahn) will be placed in your hearts. We said: O Messenger of God, what does the word wahn mean? He said: Love of this world, and fear of death.
In this hadith, lukewarm Muslims love their earthly life and seek comfort and safety, whereas, real Muslims are jihadists who love death. Real Muslims are feared by kafirs. Fear of Muslims is what Allah wants.
But Islam is fatalistic. Allah controls people’s wills and causes lukewarm Muslims to rebel against him by placing ‘wahn’ in their minds. Kafirs have no reason to fear lukewarm Muslims, because they do not go forth in jihad. Lukewarm Muslims are no different from kafirs…they are ‘rubbish’…so they must be replaced by real Muslims who conduct jihad.
“O you who believe! What is the matter with you that when you are asked to go forth in the cause of Allah (jihad) you cling heavily to the earth? Do you prefer the life of this world to the hereafter? But little is the comfort of this life as compared with the hereafter. Unless you go forth He will punish you with a grievous penalty and put others in your place; but Him you would not harm in the least. For Allah has power over all things.” – K. 9:38-9
Mohammed’s Allies Agreed to Unending Jihad
When Mohammed arrived in Medina with few followers, he needed allies to begin jihad. Those tribes that made an alliance with Mohammed understood jihad as their main task.
“We are those who have given a pledge of allegiance to Muhammad that we will carry on Jihad as long as we live.” – Bukhari 4,52,87
According to the above, jihad is unending. Other hadiths also confirm that jihad is endless:
“As for one who disbelieves, we will fight him forever in the Cause of Allah. Killing him is a small matter to us.” – Tabari IX: 69
“‘Men, do you know what you are pledging yourselves to in swearing allegiance to this man?’ ‘Yes. In swearing allegiance to him we are pledging to wage war against all mankind.'” – Ishaq: 204
Jihad is the Proper Career for Muslims
Furthermore, according to Mohammed, jihad is not just a job, but a career.
…It is mentioned from Ibn ‘Umar from the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, “My provision has been placed under the shadow of my spear, and abasement and humility have been placed on the one who disobeys my command.” – Bukhari 61, 2756
Good Muslims imitate Mohammed. Good Muslims threaten kafirs to submit: ‘Accept Islam and you will be safe’. Good Muslims make war on kafirs to remove their possessions and human rights. Kafirs are despoiled for the political crime of disobeying Mohammed.
‘Abasement’ and ‘humility’ mean making kafirs captive nations under discriminatory Sharia law. Thus, the purpose of jihad is to rob and subjugate non-Muslims and enrich and empower Muslims.
Jihad Brings Wealth
“O you who believe! If you will aid (the cause of) Allah He will aid you and plant your feet firmly.” – K. 47:7
As well, Mohammed is owner of the earth and Muslims will gain the treasures of Rome and Persia and the world through jihad (q.v. Bukhari 4,52,220).
Jihad makes Muslims Strong through Plunder
“The spoils of war were not made lawful for any people before us. This is because Allah saw our weakness and humility and made them lawful for us.” – Sahih Muslim 19,4327
Jihad is More Religious than Kind Deeds
Allah, the Exalted, says, Do you make the giving of drink to pilgrims or the maintenance of the Sacred Mosque equal to (the pious service of) those who believe in Allah and the Last Day and strive with might and main in the cause of Allah? They are not comparable in the sight of Allah: and Allah guides not those who do wrong (by avoiding jihad). Those who believe and suffer exile and strive with might and main in Allah’s cause with their goods and their persons have the highest rank in the sight of Allah: They are the people who will achieve (paradise). – K. 9:19-20.
It is not pious deeds, but the political act of jihad that guarantees religious salvation.
Jihad as Defined in Sharia Law
The legal definition of jihad is given in the authoritative Reliance of the Traveller, o9.0:
“Jihad means to war against non-Muslims.”
The Reliance of the Traveller is Sunni Islam’s authoritative volume on Sharia law. It is endorsed by Alazhar University, Islam’s equivalent of the Vatican.
Eminent Islamologist Hans Jansen points out that, to the original Muslims, jihad only meant violence: “The first generations of Muslims never understood anything else but ‘waging war’ when they heard the word jihad.”
Up to this point, the evidence has shown that…real Muslims are those who follow original Islam; they conduct war against non-Muslims; Mohammed says jihad is the proper career of Muslims; peaceful civilian jobs are a way of avoiding jihad.
But is this condition permanent in Islam? Can Islam be changed?
Can Jihad be abandoned? Can Islam be reformed?
Unfortunately, no. Jihad—warfare against non-Muslims—is the perfectly revealed ‘original religion’ of Islam declared in various ways by the final Messenger himself. It may not be changed.
‘Far removed (from mercy), those who changed (the religion) after me! – Bukhari Volume 9, Book 88, Number 174
Allah brings Muslims back to Original Islam
Islam may go off track for brief periods, but Allah will send someone to return it to his path.
Narrated Abu Hurayrah: The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: Allah shall raise for this Ummah at the head of every century a man who shall renew (or revive) for it its religion. – Sunan Abu Dawud 37, 4278
‘Revival’ in Islam means the revival of conducting jihad.
Modern Teachings on Jihadism
Jihadism is the teaching that jihad is the central mission of Islam.
In his 2008 sermon “Allah is Preparing us for Victory” , the late Anwar Awlaki wrote:
“Some Muslims say the way forward for this Ummah is to distance itself from terrorism and spend their time in becoming good in Business, good in technology, agriculture, and the rest; and this is how we can compete with the rest of the world. The commentators on this hadith (Abu Dawud 23:3455) say going back to the (religion) here means going back to (Jihad for Allah) the only way to go back to the (religion) is to go back to (Jihad for Allah) so Jihad becomes equal to the religion; the solution of the Ummah is to go back to Jihad fe Sabeelillah.”
Awlaki goes into details of jihadism as a money-making technique for modern Muslims:
“Leave the farming to the people of the book (Jews and Christians), you go and spread the religion of Allah (through jihad) they will farm and they will feed you; they will pay Jizya (poll tax), they will pay Kharaaj (tribute), if the (sustenance) of (the Messenger) was through Ghaneema (plunder) it must be the best (sustenance) and better than farming, business, shepherding and better than anything else because (the Messenger) said: “My (sustenance) comes beneath the shadow of my spear.”
Awlaki then argues that through robbery and extortion at the expense of kafirs, no Muslim will ever need to pay taxes. This will succeed because it is Mohammed’s original Islam.
Muslims Demand a Global Caliphate and Sharia
Opinion surveys consistently find that around 65% of Muslims worldwide approve of a global caliphate under discriminatory Sharia law. This state of affairs could only be achieved through a general jihad by Muslims, since a caliphate would be resisted by the superpowers. Nevertheless, Islamic dictatorship is a majority opinion among Muslims.
Is Jihad a Suicide Pact in the Nuclear Era?
Jihad is original Islam and Mohammed’s method. Consequently, Muslims are caught in this logical dilemma: If Mohammed’s method is still valid, therefore Islam is a suicide pact in the nuclear era; but if endless jihad is no longer valid, therefore Mohammed was wrong and original Islam is false. Muslims tiptoe around nuclear annihilation, rather than say Islam is false. Today, many Muslims hope to conduct jihad by other, stealthier means…since jihad may be conducted by word, by money or by the pen.
All the same, modern Muslims are aware that jihad is the litmus test for Mohammed’s original religion, but they are patiently awaiting the right leader.
This inspiring leader—a religious warlord—will call Muslims to a general jihad and establish a utopian dictatorship under discriminatory Sharia law. Muslims balk at imagining how apocalyptic this general jihad would be, even though it is obvious.
Using mathematical analysis, Bill Warner has revealed that jihad is the preponderant theme of the Islamic Trilogy.
Jihadism is thus not a far-fetched aberration promoted by a small minority of Muslims…it is the hidden agenda of Muslims…it is foundational Islam…the ‘original religion’ of Mohammed.
Original Islam is jihad, not peace.
Bill Warner, Director, Center for the Study of Political Islam
Permalink https://politicalislam.com/mohammeds-litmus-test/
by Kenneth Roberts
Photoshopping is slang for the digital editing of photos. In photoshopping, images are edited and manipulated to create an illusion or deception.
Helicopter Shark Mohammed
The ‘Helicopter_Shark‘ was a famous example of photo manipulation in which two photographs were digitally combined to give the impression that a shark was leaping from the water to attack a military helicopter. Modern Islamic apologetics go to similar lengths to manipulate the biography of Mohammed even adding elements not in the foundational texts. A typical example of Islamic ‘helicopter shark’ is this story:
There was a lady who threw garbage in the path of the Prophet on a daily basis. One day, she didn‘t do it. The prophet went to inquire about her health, because he thought she might be sick. This lady ended up converting to Islam.
There is no reference provided for the preceding, because it is not Islamic. The actual story is from the life of Abdul Baha, a founder of Baha’iism that has been photoshopped into Mohammed’s biography by modern Muslim apologists.
The real story of a woman who insulted Mohammed is found below with its reference:
A Jewish woman used to insult the Prophet and say bad things about him, so a man strangled her until she died, and the Prophet ruled that no blood money was due in this case. (Abu Dawud 4349)
Glamour Photo Mohammed
In glamour photos, the term “airbrushing” describes the removal of physical imperfections of photo models or the enhancement of their attributes in an attempt to fabricate an image of unrealistic female perfection.
Modern Muslims similarly create an ‘airbrushed’ or ‘photoshopped’ image of Mohammed by leaving out his offensive traits and enhancing any qualities that appeal to our modern concerns for human rights and civil liberties.
Here is an example of ‘airbrushed’ Mohammed found on an Islamic website:
“He (Mohammed) suffered from all but harmed none. He was affectionate and loving towards his friends and forgiving and merciful towards his enemies. He was sincere and honest in his mission; good and fair in his dealings; and just in deciding affairs of friends as well as of enemies. In short, all goodness and excellence have been combined in the person and personality of Hazrat Mohammed”.
However, the unphotoshopped Mohammed is neither affectionate nor merciful:
“Aisha, the Mother of the Faithful, was asked, ‘How did the Messenger of Allah behave?’ She replied, ‘His eye did not weep for anyone.’” Tabari VIII:40
Object Removal
A main aim in photo editing is the removal of unwanted objects in the photo. Before photoshopping, this was done by airbrushing. Stalin routinely airbrushed his enemies out of photographs. The term “airbrushed out” has come to mean rewriting history to pretend something was never there.
Contemporary academics have called the process of removing components from an image object removal. It is considered unethical because it is an intentional misrepresentation of historical facts.
The ‘objects’ modern Islamists want to remove are Mohammed’s …
…authoritarianism
‘It is not fitting for a Believer, man or woman, when a matter has been decided by Allah and His Messenger to have any option about their decision.’ Koran 33.36
…megalomania
‘While I was sleeping, the keys to the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand.’ Bukhari:V4B52N220
…misogyny
“Hang up your scourge where your wife can see it.” Kash-shaf (the revealer) of al-Zamkhshari (Vol. 1, p. 525)
…intolerance
“No two religions are to exist in the Arab Peninsula”, The Sira, pp. 50, 51
…compulsion
“The apostle of God defeated the people until they entered Islam by hook or by crook.” “The Ordinances of Qur’an”, Al Shafi, page 50
…supremacism
“Make war on them until idolatry shall cease and God’s religion shall reign supreme.” K. 8:39
…terrorism
“How many a township have We destroyed! As a raid by night, or while they slept at noon, Our terror came unto them.” K. 7:4
‘Terrorists cannot be Muslims’ or can they?
One of the claims of modern Islamists is that ‘a terrorist cannot be a Muslim’.
Just after 9-11, the late Anwar Awlaki, mentor to notable terrorists, said, “There is no way that the people who did this (9-11) could be Muslim, and if they claim to be Muslim, then they have perverted their religion.” Awlaki’s later terrorism proved he did not believe his own definition.
By Awlaki’s definition, many leading Muslims of history are excluded from the religion of Islam:
Osama Bin Laden was not a Muslim when he cast terror into the hearts of Americans on 9-11.
Sayeed Maududi was not a Muslim when he wrote: “Islam wishes to destroy all States and Governments anywhere on the face of the earth which are opposed to the ideology and programme of Islam.” Sayeed Abdul A’la Maududi, Jihad in Islam, p.9
Sultan Mehmet V was also not a Muslim when he signed the Universal Fatwa of 1915 sanctioning the genocide of three million of his Christian subjects.
Ibn Khaldun (1332-1406), was not a Muslim when he wrote, “the holy war is a religious duty, because of the universalism of the Muslim mission and (the obligation to) convert everybody to Islam either by persuasion or by force.” (emphasis added)
Tamurlane was not a Muslim when he wrote glowingly of his mass murders: ‘I had crossed the rivers Ganges and Jumna and I had sent many of the abominable infidels to hell, and had purified the land from their foul existence….Thanks to almighty Allah.”
Hajjaj, the governor of Iraq was not a Muslim when he ordered his general Qasim to “behave in such a way that no enemy of the true faith is left in that country”.
Mohammed’s successful general Khalid ibn Walid was not a Muslim when Mohammed sent him to destroy all the pagan temples of the neighboring tribes of Mecca. Khalid reached the Jazima tribe and asked them to say, “We are Muslims”. But they said, “We are Sabians” – whereupon Khalid slaughtered the whole tribe.
By Awlaki’s definition, Mohammed could not be a Muslim either. The Sira (his official biography) is filled with violent acts initiated by Mohammed. In the Sira, Mohammed orders or leads a violent act every six weeks resulting in assassination, plundering, enslavement, rape, genocide, ethnic cleansing and territorial conquest.
The Sira explicitly states that many detractors ran away because of Mohammed’s acts of terrorism. The Sira depicts Mohammed as a successful terrorist. Muslim apologists seldom refer to the Sira…object removal.
The Ethics of Manipulating Mohammed’s Image
In Islam, it is considered moral to manipulate Mohammed’s image to create a favorable impression with kafirs. The moral basis for photoshopping Mohammed’s ‘image’ is called taqiyya.
Taqiyya is sacred concealment for the advancement of Islamic political supremacism. Taqiyya is a form of verbal jihad used to defeat Islam’s opponents by using disinformation. Mohammed used taqiyya frequently in the Sira.
Taqiyya is a doctrine of disinformation endorsed by all branches of Islam. Governments of Islamic countries use taqiyya as a normative policy technique, especially in Shi’ite Iran where taqiyya has greater acceptability.
Taqiyya is basically a kind of object removal.
Our Reaction to Islamic Photoshopping
In light of Islam’s dualistic doctrine of taqiyya, should we ever take at face value the depictions of Mohammed invented by modern apologists of Islam? Or should we rigorously investigate them and do our own research into Islam’s foundational texts to determine whether they have been photoshopped?
Should we not compare the photoshopped versions of Islam with Islam’s canonical writers and spokesmen? Should we not study orthodox authorities of Islam such as Bukhari, Ibn Ishaq, Taymiyyah, Tabari, Nawawi, Ibn Kathir, since they represent Islam’s canonical consensus?
As we saw, Muslim apologists, like the late Anwar Awlaki, use taqiyya to justify misrepresentations of Mohammed’s biography or of the supremacist agenda of jihad, Mohammed’s method.
We need to ask: ‘Has this image of a non-violent Mohammed been photoshopped?’
Bill Warner, Director, Center for the Study of Political Islam
Permalink https://politicalislam.com/photoshopped-mohammed/
Copyright © 2011 CBSX, LLC, politicalislam.com
by Vijay Kumar
THE KABAH IN MECCA WAS NOT BUILT AS AN ISLAMIC MOSQUE. It was an ancient temple that had been shared by polytheists, Christians, Jews, and Hindus, honoring 360 different deities. In 630 A.D. the Kabah was captured by Islam in its military invasion and conquest of Mecca.
On the day of its capture, Mohammed delivered an address at the Kabah in military dress and helmet, according to Ayatullah Ja’far Subhani in his book, “The Message”:
“Bear in mind that every claim of privilege, whether that of blood or property is abolished . . . I reject all claims relating to life and property and all imaginary honors of the past, and declare them to be baseless . . . A Muslim is the brother of another Muslim and all the Muslims are brothers of one another and constitute one hand as against the non-Muslims. The blood of every one of them is equal to that of others and even the smallest among them can make a promise on behalf of others.” —Mohammed
Mohammed’s address at the Kabah overthrew the Meccan government and declared all of Islam, anywhere in the world, to be a political and military state against all non-Muslims, regardless of the non-Muslims’ political, geographical, or national origins.
“If anyone desires a religion other than Islam (submission to Allah), never will it be accepted of him.” —Koran 3:85
Although the rightful owners of the Kabah are the many religions that shared it before the Islamic military conquest of Mecca, according to Subhani the Kabah today is under the control of a hereditary regime going back to Mohammed: “currently the 12th Imam from the direct descent of the Prophet of Islam is the real protector, its custodian and guardian.”
All Islamic mosques everywhere in the world are required to have a clear visible indication pointing in the direction of Mecca and the Kabah, where the international political and military state of Islam was founded. In most mosques there is a niche in the wall—the mihrab—that points toward the seat of Islamic power. Each mosque, like the Kabah, is governed by an Imam in compliance with the political documents of Islam.
Mosques and the Political Documents of Islam
The Koran is the supreme political document of Islam—its political manifesto and political constitution. It is the only constitution of the nation-state Saudi Arabia, which is the home of Mecca and the Kabah, where all mosques point, and is the birthplace of Islam.
The Koran is a totalitarian constitution. It demands submission by anyone within its jurisdiction. The Koran governs all mosques everywhere in the world.
As a political document, the Koran asserts that everyone in the world is within its jurisdiction. So far, Islam has not been able to enforce that totalitarian claim on the entire world, but has managed to do so through threat, infiltration, violence, terrorism, and coercion on roughly 20% of the world. It is engaged in a 1400-year-long Universal Jihad to dominate the rest of the world. All mosques are its outpost headquarters.
Central to the Koran’s political mandates is prohibition of religious freedom and religious tolerance, along with denouncements of religions such as Christianity and Judaism.
“O ye who believe! take not the Jews and the Christians for your friends and protectors: They are but friends and protectors to each other. And he amongst you that turns to them (for friendship) is of them.” —Koran 5:51
“Fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war)” —Koran 9:5
All mosque leaders must be loyal to and supportive of these political and militaristic mandates.
The Koran as a political document also forbids separation of church and state. That is why every Islamic nation, where Islamic leaders have managed to gain power, is a theocracy, ruled by the Koran and Islamic Sharia law.
The Hadith (reported sayings and acts of Mohammed) and the Sira (the official biographies of Mohammed) are the other political documents that, along with the Koran, constitute the basis for Islam’s Sharia law.
“There is only one law which ought to be followed, and that is the Sharia.” —Syed Qutb
Sharia law is administered by Islamic Imams who interpret the law and hand down rulings in their sole discretion. Sharia law does not allow trial by jury. Sharia law also mandates a double standard of laws for Muslims (believers) and infidels (non-believers). Sharia law mandates a discriminatory tax, called jizya, on non-Islamic religions and nations:
“Fight those who believe not in Allah…until they pay the jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.” —Koran 9:29
Sharia law also mandates discrimination toward women, and forbids any criticism of Islam or its founder, stifling freedom of speech.
Sharia law also mandates that all men are slaves with no right to freedom of religion:
“Allah’s right on His slaves is that they should worship Him (Alone) and should not worship any besides Him.” —Mohammed, Sahih Bukhari 4:52:108, Narrated Mu’adh
Sharia law does not allow for separation of church and state. Sharia regards church and state as one inseparable entity governing every aspect of individual and social life, both spiritual and secular. That is why all Islamic nations are theocracies.
In short, Sharia law stands in direct opposition to the American Constitution and Bill of Rights. The implementation of Sharia law demands the overthrow of the American Constitution and our form of government and system of laws. Mosque leaders, in every nation in the world, are loyal to the Koran, the Hadith, the Sira, and consider them divine law, and therefore supreme over all manmade laws.
Other political and military documents of Islam include treaties of Mohammed, which are held in reverence by Islam as models of conduct in relations between nations.
“Ye have indeed in the Messenger of Allah [Mohammed] a beautiful pattern (of conduct) for anyone whose hope is in Allah.” —Koran 33:21
“War is deceit.” —Mohammed, Sahih Bukhari 4:52:268, Narrated Abu Hurarira
In one treaty proposal, to Jaifer and Abd, Mohammed wrote:
“If you two accept Islam, your country will, as usual, remain with you. But if you refuse or object, it is a perishable thing.” —Mohammed
In another, to the Chiefs of Aqaba, he wrote:
“It is better for you either to accept Islam or agree to pay Jizya and consent to remain obedient to Allah . . . If you do not accept these terms . . . I shall have to wage war (to bring peace and security).” —Mohammed
These same patterns and political mandates have been used over and over by Muslims since 610 A.D. to invade and conquer many civilizations and nations throughout the world, and to eradicate human rights and freedoms in those lands. Iran once was called Persia and was Zorastrian. Egypt was Christian. What was once a Hindu civilization was conquered and made into Pakistan, which is now part of the Axis of Jihad, along with Iran and Saudi Arabia. Afghanistan was Buddhist for thousands of years. Now its chief exports are heroin and Islamic terrorism.
“When We decide to destroy a population, We (first) send a definite order to those among them who are given the good things of this life and yet transgress; so that the word is proved true against them: then (it is) We destroy them utterly.” —Koran 17:16
In every instance where Islam has conquered and “destroyed utterly” a nation or civilization, the key to the conquest was the establishment of mosques, which are political and military command and control centers for Islam, and which all point toward the seat of Islamic power: the Kabah.
Mosques and the Fallacy of the “Moderate Muslim”
The majority of Germans during World War II were not active members of the Nazi party, were not waging war, and were not involved in the holocaust. The leaders, though, were active members of the Nazi party, were waging war, and were involved in the holocaust.
The majority of Russians and eastern Europeans under the rule of the U.S.S.R. were not trying to spread Communism throughout the world, and were not threatening and waging war and revolution, but were going about their daily lives trying to survive. The leaders, though, were doing everything they could to spread Communism throughout the world, and were threatening and waging war and revolution.
Throughout history, since 610 A.D., the leaders of Islam have been waging Universal Jihad around the world for the purpose of Islamic totalitarian domination of the world. It has never mattered what percentage of the Muslim population was “peaceful” or “moderate.” Peace and moderation are not relevant to the totalitarian mandates of Islam’s political documents, and Islam’s leaders always follow the totalitarian mandates of Universal Jihad contained in them.
There are post-Nazi democracies. There are post-Communist democracies. There are no post-Islamic democracies. Literal Islam, as contained in its political documents, is the consummate totalitarianism. Neither Nazism or Communism had a metaphysical factor, as does Islam. Islam uses its metaphysics as a wedge to drive in its totalitarian political doctrines.
Once Islam has established itself sufficiently in any nation, it seeks to overthrow any existing regime or constitution or law, and replace it with Islamic theocracy. Even the most “moderate” Muslim is bound to obey Islamic law, and so is bound to fight if ordered to fight:
“When you are called (by the Muslim ruler) for fighting, go forth immediately.” —Hadith Sahih Bukhari 4:52:79:Narrated Ibn ‘Abbas
All Islamic mosques have Islamic leaders (rulers) who can call Muslims for fighting, and as such are satellite headquarters for spreading Literal Islam’s political doctrine of world domination and totalitarianism—no matter how many “moderate Muslims” they serve.
Mosques and the Worldwide Islamic State
Islam is a de facto political state wherever it exists anywhere in the world. The Koran is its constitution. The Kabah is its seat of power, still in the control of the regime that occupied it in 630 A.D. All Muslims in the world, regardless of nationality, are required to travel to the Kabah at least once in their lifetime and pay homage to it.
The fact that nations and international political institutions in the world do not recognize Islam as a de jure state is irrelevant. Mohammed himself declared it as a state, and Islam’s own political documents declare it to be a state, and, ipso facto, it always is a state-within-a-state, governed by the Koran and Sharia law internally, anywhere that it has not yet gained full power and control.
“The Believers are but a single brotherhood.” —Koran 49:10
“A Muslim has no nationality except his belief.” —Syed Qutb
“Islam wishes to destroy all states and governments anywhere on the face of the earth which are opposed to the ideology and program of Islam regardless of the country or the nation which rules it. The purpose of Islam is to set up a State on the basis of its own ideology and program.” — Syed Abul A’ala Maududi
Just as our Constitution of the United States binds and identifies us as a single political and legal union of non-contiguous states, territories, political groups, and people, so the Koran binds and identifies all Islamic nations and all Muslims as a single political and legal union of non-contiguous nations, territories, political groups and people, regardless of geographic boundaries, whose seat of power is the occupied Kabah. All Islamic Imams, in every mosque everywhere in the world, are bound to the Koran as supreme law.
As we have seen, Islamic law gives Islamic Imams the power to order Muslims to fighting. The German Max Weber, who had considerable influence on international law and politics, defined “state” as that entity that has a “monopoly on the legitimate use of physical force within a given territory.”
Islam declares that the Koran and Sharia law are divine, and, as such, are the only “legitimate” law in the world. In that way, Islam “self-legitimizes” its right to use physical force anywhere in the world, and the right of every Imam in every mosque in the world to call for physical force and violence at any time. This makes every Imam in every mosque a military leader.
Islam is a state by every definition and theory, and is a state hostile to and at war with the United States of America and its Constitution.
Mosques and Treason and Sedition Against the U.S.
Islam’s political documents and law call for the overthrow of our Constitution and our man-made laws, and therefore for the overthrow of our government, which by definition constitutes sedition and treason. The Islamic documents call for the overthrow of our government—a protector of religious freedom and human rights—through violence:
“I was ordered to fight all men until they say ‘there is no god but Allah.’” —Mohammed’s farewell address, 632
“I have been ordered to fight with the people till they say, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’” —Hadith Sahih Bukhari 4:52:196 Narrated Abu Huraira
“He who fights so that Allah’s Word (Islam) should be superior, then he fights in Allah’s cause.” —Hadith Sahih Bukhari 1:3:125 Narrated Abu Musa
“I asked the Prophet [Mohammed], ‘What is the best deed?’ He replied, ‘To believe in Allah and to fight for His Cause.’” —Hadith Sahih Bukhari 3:46:694 Narrated Abu Dhar
“And fight them till there is no more affliction (i.e. no more worshiping of others along with Allah)”. —Hadith Sahih Bukhari 6:60:40 Narrated Nafi’
“Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers.” —Koran 3.151
“I am with you: give firmness to the Believers: I will instill terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off them.” —Koran 8:12
“Against them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into (the hearts of) the enemies, of Allah and your enemies, and others besides, whom ye may not know, but whom Allah doth know.” —Koran 8:60
The Koran, as the constitution of Islam and Muslims, is diametrically opposite to the United States Constitution and Bill of Rights. According to Islam and Muslims, the Koran is divine law, uncorrupted and incorruptible, whereas the United States Constitution is man-made and is not infallible, and therefore is corrupt. The U.S. Constitution is the antithesis of the Koran; therefore Muslims have no obligation to obey it.
A mosque in the United States is a command and control center of a foreign political and military state that seeks the overthrow of our government, and an Imam in a mosque is a political and military representative of a foreign state that calls for the overthrow of the United States.
The laws of the United States provide specific criminal penalties for sedition and treason. These laws are not only applicable to those advocating and calling for the overthrow of our Constitution and our government; they are applicable to anyone who gives “aid or comfort” to such declared enemies of the United States, or who “organizes or helps or attempts to organize any society, group, or assembly of persons” so engaged. The terms “organizes” and “organize” extend to “the recruiting of new members, the forming of new units, and the regrouping or expansion of existing clubs, classes, and other units of such society, group, or assembly of persons.”
Mosques are just such units.
______________________
Vijay Kumar is a Republican candidate for U.S. Congress from Tennessee’s 5th District. A native of Hyderabad, India, Mr. Kumar lived in Iran during the 1979 Islamic Revolution, when he came to the United States. A naturalized American citizen, Mr. Kumar has lived in Nashville, Tennessee for 24 years. He has been married to his wife, Robin, a native of Bowling Green, Kentucky, for 27 years, and they have three children, two of whom are adopted.
by Kenneth Roberts
Mohammed was the dominant alpha male in his society. Mohammed was the quintessential alpha male. His unlimited polygamy, his monopoly on the use of force to dominate others, his monopoly on divine revelation, his claim of special powers not given to others, such as superhuman eloquence (Sahih Bukhari 9,87,127), his claim of 20% of all the plunder stolen in raids…all expressed and reinforced his alpha-ness.
We see alpha male behavior throughout the animal kingdom, for instance, in a troop of baboons or a pride of lions. Everyone around the alpha male is subservient to him and exists only to satisfy his urges and to comply with his demands. Of course, the underlings in the group must constantly show the alpha male respect and ‘honor’, otherwise the alpha male will growl, bare his teeth and bite if necessary, even to the extent of killing to restore his honor. Political Islam works the same way. The Muslim response to disrespect towards Islam is one of the most visible signs of this alpha male instinct to defend ‘honor’ through violence.
The alpha male in Islam is under no obligation to give anything to or help the ‘other’ outside his immediate group-in any way, shape or form–but only to protect those within his group. The Golden Rule has no place in the animal kingdom, or in Islam. Violence is their mechanism of survival.
In Muslim society, the Muslim alpha male respects only another Muslim alpha male and only if he can demonstrate that he has everything under control; otherwise he will be despised. The non-Muslim is at the bottom of the hierarchy and is treated with the utmost contempt. Kafirs are dirty subhumans to a Muslim. The kafir is similar to an animal that has no right to graze the land or drink at the water-hole…an animal, whose only right is to be preyed upon for food. This is the meat of Islamic morals.
Jewish ethics are based on the Ten Commandments and the Golden Rule, but Mohammed brought a new theocracy based on the primacy of the alpha male. Allah substituted the Arabs for their Jewish cousins… not on the basis of ethics…but on the Arabs’ ability to act like alpha males.
The Ten Commandments were tossed out and were replaced by Mohammed’s ‘alpha-ness’. Islamic Sharia law is based on the alpha-ness of Mohammed. An action is ‘good’, not because God said so on a table of stone, but because Mohammed did so…from stabbing his verbal critics, to raping war captives, to genocide, to plundering unarmed caravans.
Mohammed dispensed with the Golden Rule and most of the Ten Commandments, since they were incompatible with his opportunistic ethics…the survival of the fittest…the supremacism of ‘the best of people’ (i.e. the Arabs), whom Mohammed conscripted to usurp the Israelites, Persians and Romans as the new alphas on the world stage.
Mohammed’s world is a theocratic dictatorship in which human behavior is motivated by the desire to dominate on the part of those who are allowed to, and fear on the part of those who are selected to be dominated…the dirty kafirs (‘najis kufar’ in Arabic).
Soul-searching is an alien concept in Mohammedan supremacism. In Mohammed’s society, there is no need for self-evaluation or self-criticism, apart from asking whether the alpha male is getting his rightful share and his due respect. There is no need for any Muslim to evaluate his behavior beyond this point. The dominance of the Islamic male is proof of Allah’s support for Islam, thus, the more domineering a Muslim is, the more Allah is seen to support him.
If a Muslim bows to the narcissism of Mohammed or to that of his Islamic head of state, he is ethical enough. Giving to ‘others’, without being forced to do so, is seen as a sign of weakness unfitting for the alpha male. What generally distinguishes the alpha male is his opportunism. Opportunism is the opposing principle to the Golden Rule. With no Golden Rule, Islam is intrinsically opportunistic.
A number of ancient rulers were notable alpha males: Julius Caesar, Hannibal, Nero and Genghis Khan. Mohammed clearly patterned himself on historic examples of pathological narcissism, particularly that of Alexander the Great. For some reason, Mohammed was enraptured by the legend of world-conquering Alexander the Great and claimed this vicious killer as a monotheist and even a proto-Muslim.
To the contrary, the historical Alexander was a confirmed polytheist and even claimed for himself the title of ‘Son of Amon’…making Alexander the ‘Son of God’…of Amon, the principle Egyptian god, ‘Lord of truth, father of the gods, maker of men’. Amon-Ra was associated with alpha male dominance, as a woolly ram-headed deity with curved horns. Since rams were considered a symbol of virility, due to their rutting behavior, Amon also became thought of as a fertility deity.
The Koran is filled with ancient legends and stories plagiarized from a plethora of pagan, Jewish and Christian texts. Textual analysis has identified precisely what they were.
Mohammed’s saga of the alpha male Alexander did not come from history…clearly, Mohammed did not get his information that way…but from ‘legends’. Due to the discovery of 3rd century texts, we now know where Mohammed got his ideas about Alexander. A highly-romanticized Christian legend composed in the 3rd century A.D. in Alexandria implied that Alexander was a monotheist (far from the truth). However, coins and monuments of Alexander depicted him with ram’s horns on his head.
‘Dhul-Qarnain‘ (‘the two-horned one’) features prominently in the Koran. Mohammed’s biographer Ibn Hishaq claimed, ‘Dhul-Qarnain is Alexander the Greek, the king of Persia and Greece, or the king of the east and the west, for because of this he was called Dhul-Qarnain’.
It requires no Sherlock Holmes to see that Mohammed’s persona was constructed from that of world-conqueror Alexander the Great, combined with that of Moses, conqueror of Canaan. Mohammed’s intoxicating fantasy captured the romance, theocracy and military genius of both men and presented him (Mohammed) to the Arabs as the combination of all their alpha qualities rolled into one.
Apart from the story of Alexander, the Koran contains aggressive alpha imagery:
‘We hurl the truth at falsehood and it knocks out its brains.’ (K.21.18)
In the Islamic paradise, it is the most aggressive alpha males who receive the highest rewards. (cf. K. 9:111)
All in all, we require no message from an Arabian moon god to reveal alpha male behavior to us. Alpha behavior is well known in much of the animal kingdom, as well as in criminal enterprises…such as biker gangs…and in fascist politicians who impose their cult of personality on vulnerable populations.
Much of current Islamic rage takes place at the inchoate, psychological level of alpha male narcissism. Alpha behaviors such as honor-killings and cartoon riots defend the ‘honor’, misogyny and supremacism that Muslim males have a vested interest in maintaining.
Of course, Mohammed’s supremacist model for society is incompatible with a pluralistic democracy based on non-violence, equality and tolerance in the public and personal spheres. The two models contradict one another.
Whether Mohammed’s alpha male fantasy has the slightest chance of surviving in the Age of Aquarius, well, that’s another story.
Bill Warner, Center for the Study of Political Islam
Permalink
Copyright © 2010 CBSX, LLC
politicalislam.com Use and distribute as you wish; do not edit and give us credit.